Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on 9 sources
Do you know who murdered Samarius Claycomb?
Samarius Claycomb, a 30-year-old man from Louisville, Kentucky, spent the last night of his life doing something ordinary: walking back from a neighborhood store to the apartment complex where his girlfriend lived. It was late on February 29, 2012, when gunfire shattered the routine quiet of the 600 block of South 37th Street in west Louisville. Neighbors later described hearing an initial burst of shots, followed by more rapid gunfire minutes later. When police arrived just after 10 p.m., they found Claycomb lying behind an apartment building, suffering from multiple gunshot wounds. He was pronounced dead at the scene, and the killing was recorded as one of the city’s early homicides that year.

In the days that followed, detectives canvassed the Shawnee-area neighborhood, going door to door and interviewing residents in hopes that someone had seen or heard enough to point them toward whoever had opened fire. Family members said Claycomb had simply gone to the store and was ambushed on his way back, a small window of time violently stolen. Community activist Christopher 2X spoke of relatives who felt cheated and bewildered, struggling to understand why anyone would stalk and kill someone they loved. A nearby resident recalled staying inside, listening to the sequence of shots and, afterward, an eerie stillness in which no one seemed to flee and no cars sped away, only the echo of gunfire hanging over the block.

Months turned into more than a year with no arrest. In June 2013, Claycomb’s relatives gathered at 37th and Broadway for a vigil, clutching photos and memories while appealing publicly for witnesses to speak up. News reports described the family as “praying for answers,” with his father, Samarius Claycomb Sr., explaining that they still had no clear evidence about what had happened or who had pulled the trigger. Police at that time said they had no suspects, and the case, at least in public view, looked like it might join the ranks of unsolved shootings that haunt many Louisville families.

Behind the scenes, however, investigators continued working the file. Nearly two years after the killing, in early 2014, a Jefferson County grand jury heard evidence in the case and indicted a suspect who was already behind bars: Richard Conn Jr. Conn, known on the streets by a nickname but addressed in court by his full name, was at that time jailed on separate charges in a different murder case from 2013. Prosecutors alleged that he was responsible for Claycomb’s death on South 37th Street and charged him with murder and complicity to robbery, suggesting that theft may have been a motive. A woman, Danielle Ward, then 26, was also charged with complicity to first-degree robbery in connection with the 2012 shooting. Claycomb’s relatives said they did not know Conn or Ward and had never heard of them before investigators brought Conn’s name forward as a person of interest months earlier. Still, the indictment lifted a “huge weight” from the family, offering the first concrete sign that someone might be held accountable.

The legal process took another turn in October 2015. Rather than go to trial on the original murder charge, Conn entered an Alford plea to reckless homicide in Claycomb’s death, a legal maneuver in which a defendant maintains innocence but acknowledges that the prosecution has enough evidence to likely win a conviction. The plea papers and contemporaneous news coverage state that Claycomb was shot outside an apartment in the 600 block of South 37th Street in February 2012, aligning the court record with what had been reported since the night of the killing. In the same hearing, Conn also entered Alford pleas in other cases, including charges out of Hopkins County. A judge sentenced him to a total of seven years in prison across all matters, a relatively short term compared with what a murder conviction could have carried. For Claycomb’s family, the outcome meant that someone formally accepted legal responsibility for the shooting that had devastated them, but it did not erase the years of uncertainty, the unanswered questions about why he was targeted, or the sense that no sentence could truly balance the loss of a life cut short on an otherwise ordinary walk home.