Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
On the evening of May 15, 2019, the quiet of Myrtle Street in Jackson’s Belhaven neighborhood was broken by gunfire inside a modest house where Margaret Victoria Pierce had built a late-in-life routine of ordinary days. Pierce, a 73-year-old white woman, lived there with her longtime boyfriend, Hugh McLaurin, in a part of northeast Jackson better known for old trees and front porches than police tape and flashing lights.

Away from that violent final night, fragments of Pierce’s life paint a picture of a quiet, steady woman rooted in Mississippi. Memorial tributes describe her as sweet and caring, someone who took in stray animals and looked after people who needed help, including, as one remembrance put it, the man who would later take her life. She was retired after working for the State of Mississippi and had ties to Tunica High School and Belhaven College, suggesting a lifetime spent in the state’s small towns and the capital city’s academic circles. Another online comment, written by someone who identified himself as a former husband, recalled a marriage that had ended decades earlier and noted that she had no children, reinforcing the sense that her closest family, by 2019, may have been the friends and neighbors who knew her in Belhaven.

Shortly before 8 p.m. that Wednesday, Jackson police received a 911 call from the Myrtle Street address. Officers arrived to find Pierce inside the home with multiple gunshot wounds, the kind of close-range violence that offered little chance of survival even as first responders tried to help. The caller—an elderly man—was still on scene when they arrived, and investigators quickly came to believe he was the one who had summoned them. For neighbors on the block, news that someone in the house had been shot was jarring; residents later described their street as a place where families with small children lived side by side with older couples, and where sirens of any kind were unsettling, let alone the arrival of homicide detectives.

As officers pieced together what had happened, attention turned almost immediately to McLaurin. Police identified him as Pierce’s live-in boyfriend and the only other person inside the home when she was shot. According to statements given to local media, investigators were told that McLaurin opened fire because he believed he was being attacked, or that someone was trying to attack him, a claim that would become the central thread of his explanation. The case was quickly classified as a domestic, intimate-partner shooting: online records list the relationship between victim and suspect as significant others, and the scene itself—a shared residence, no evidence of intruders—supported that reading. In the stark language of incident summaries and crime databases, Pierce became one more victim of domestic gun violence, her relationship to the alleged shooter reduced to a line in a chart.

McLaurin was taken into custody at the house and brought in for questioning the same night. By the next day, Jackson police announced that he had been formally charged with murder in Pierce’s death. At his initial court appearance, a judge set his bond at $200,000, a figure later echoed in local discussion as residents debated what should happen to an aging defendant accused of killing a partner behind closed doors. News reports and a local blog that published portions of the police account emphasized that officers had never said Pierce actually attacked McLaurin—only that he claimed he believed he was under attack—leaving the public to weigh his stated fear against the reality that an unarmed woman had been shot multiple times in her own home. Commenters who said they knew the couple spoke of prior volatility, describing McLaurin as unstable and suggesting that friends and family had urged Pierce to leave the relationship before it turned deadly, though those details surfaced in community commentary rather than official filings.

Beyond those early reports, the public trail of the case grows faint. Available news coverage concentrates on the immediate aftermath—the shooting, the arrest, the bond hearing—and online incident records preserve the basic facts that Pierce was killed, that the shooting was categorized as a domestic homicide, and that McLaurin was arrested as the suspect. No widely accessible reporting clearly documents what followed in court, whether the case ended in a plea, a trial, or some other resolution, leaving the official legal ending to Pierce’s story largely out of view. What remains visible is the contrast between the life sketched by those who remembered her—a gentle, retired woman who gave her attention to animals and people in need—and the abrupt, violent way that life ended in a small house on Myrtle Street, where a relationship that had once offered companionship instead became the setting for a fatal act of domestic violence.