Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on 5 sources
A simmering road rage dispute on a spring afternoon in Indianapolis tragically escalated, leaving a 41-year-old man, Nicholas Norris, dead from multiple gunshot wounds. The male victim was riding his motorcycle with his girlfriend and another couple on May 3, 2015, when the incident began.

The confrontation started when an SUV, driven by 24-year-old Ron Stewart, allegedly cut off the two motorcycles. This led to a heated verbal exchange at a red light, during which Stewart reportedly brandished a handgun. The conflict didn't end there, as both parties pulled into the parking lot of a pawn shop on the Eastside of Indianapolis. In the ensuing altercation, Norris reportedly struck Stewart's vehicle with a small, weighted keychain. Stewart then exited his SUV and fired six shots at the motorcyclists. Norris was struck multiple times, including a fatal shot to the head, and died while en route to the hospital.

Following the shooting, Stewart fled the scene. Investigators utilized surveillance video from the area, which proved crucial in identifying him as the suspect. He was apprehended at a hotel on North Shadeland Avenue. Initially facing a preliminary charge of murder, the legal proceedings that followed delved into claims of self-defense.

During his trial, Ron Stewart contended that he fired his weapon because he felt his life was in danger. Prosecutors, however, argued that Stewart was the initial aggressor and had the opportunity to retreat. After considering the evidence, a jury acquitted Stewart of murder but found him guilty of the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter, a Level 2 felony. He was subsequently sentenced to 14 years in prison, with 10 years to be executed. Stewart later appealed his conviction, arguing that the state failed to disprove his self-defense claim and that the jury had been improperly instructed. The appellate court, however, affirmed the trial court's decision.