Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP147949)
On a day in the mid-November of 1980, a 34-year-old camera operator named Robert Vanderkar was working on an episode of the popular television series 'Magnum, P.I.' in Hawaii. He was a passenger in a Hughes 369D helicopter, part of the aerial filming unit for the show. The helicopter was flying over the waters off of the northeastern coast of Oahu, near Kaaawa Beach Park, when the aircraft experienced trouble. The helicopter, with Robert and the pilot on board, crashed into the Pacific Ocean about a quarter of a mile from the shoreline. The force of the impact and the sudden submersion into the ocean created a chaotic and life-threatening situation for both individuals on board.

The pilot of the helicopter was able to survive the crash and was subsequently rescued from the water. However, Robert Vanderkar was not immediately found. In the aftermath of the crash, an extensive search and rescue operation was launched. Rescue teams scoured the waters and coastline in the area of the crash, hoping to find any sign of the missing cameraman. Despite their determined efforts, the search for Robert was unsuccessful. He was never seen again, and his body was never recovered from the ocean. The clothing he was reported to be wearing at the time included a khaki long-sleeved shirt, blue jeans, and white tennis shoes. Due to the circumstances, certain physical details such as his height, weight, and eye color are not precisely known and were estimated for the official report.

The disappearance of Robert Vanderkar has remained an unresolved case for decades. The incident was investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board. The official account of what transpired is based on the helicopter crash and the subsequent unsuccessful search efforts. With no recovery of his remains, Robert Vanderkar was declared missing. The case is a somber reminder of the risks involved in aerial cinematography and the unforgiving power of the ocean. The lack of a resolution has left a lasting sense of loss and uncertainty for those who knew him. The overview of the case is that of a tragic accident during a television production that led to a man vanishing without a trace, leaving behind an enduring mystery in the waters off Hawaii.

Last Seen: Nov 19, 1980

Links to Additional Sources (0)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (5)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Haleiwa, Hawaii
UP6920 • Found May 24, 1983
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 19–40 vs 34 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%Same area, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%6'0" vs 6'0"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Haleiwa, Hawaii
UP6926 • Found Sep 26, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 45–55 vs 34 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%Same area, same county
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 68%5'9" vs 6'0"
Weight 72%137 lb vs 180 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Honolulu, Hawaii - unidentified case UP15422
John Doe — Honolulu, Hawaii
UP15422 • Found Jun 8, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 30–49 vs 34 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away, same county
TimingFound 36 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'0"
Weight 100%165 lb vs 180 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Honolulu, Hawaii
UP6928 • Found Apr 19, 1996
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 45–55 vs 34 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away, same county
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 68%5'9" vs 6'0"
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Waimanalo, Hawaii
UP5580 • Found Jul 18, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 34 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%30 mi away, same county
TimingFound 13 years after last seen
Height 68%5'9" vs 6'0"

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.