Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on 10 sources
Norman Clarence Manuel, 37, a Black male from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, was killed on February 18, 2019, in the East Liberty neighborhood, leaving behind grief, unanswered questions, and a community forced to reckon with the loss of a man remembered for far more than the circumstances of his death. That evening, police and medics responded to Enright Court, where they found Norman lying in the street with a gunshot wound to his chest. He was pronounced dead at the scene, and what had been an ordinary night for the neighborhood became the night his family, friends, loved ones, and community lost him to violence.

Norman’s death was ruled a homicide by the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office, but the public details surrounding what led to the shooting remained limited. He was found in the 400 block of Enright Court, an area of East Liberty where the sudden violence left people shaken. For those who knew him, the location and the police response were only part of the story. The deeper pain was that Norman was gone, taken suddenly and violently, with no chance for goodbye and no opportunity for the people who loved him to prepare for the silence that followed.

He was remembered as a creative soul, someone who carried stories inside him and found ways to bring them into the world. Norman was described as an author, poet, photographer, and filmmaker, a man who was drawn to expression and imagination. He wrote, created, captured images, and shared pieces of himself through art. To the people close to him, he was not simply someone with artistic interests; he was a storyteller at heart. His creativity was part of how he moved through life, how he connected with others, and how he left his mark.

His fiancée remembered his love of storytelling and the way creativity seemed to live naturally within him. That kind of remembrance speaks to more than talent. It speaks to who Norman was in the eyes of those who loved him: someone with depth, vision, and a voice. He had published novels and written poetry, building a life that was tied to words, images, and meaning. For his loved ones, his death was not only the loss of a person, but the loss of everything he still had left to say, create, and become.

Norman was also recognized by Point Park University as one of its students, another reminder that his life was still unfolding. He was pursuing growth, creativity, and purpose. His connection to education and the arts added another layer to the heartbreak of his killing. He was a man with goals, talents, relationships, and a future that should have continued. Instead, the people who knew him were left to honor his memory and hold onto the work, words, and moments he left behind.

In East Liberty, Norman’s death was felt as more than another act of gun violence. Community members mourned him and recognized the impact of his loss. He was described as well known and respected, someone whose presence mattered. When a person like Norman is taken, the loss spreads outward. It affects family first, then friends, then neighbors, classmates, fellow artists, readers, and everyone who had some connection to his life. His death left a space where his voice, creativity, and presence had once been.

After his passing, a homegoing service was held, giving loved ones a chance to gather, mourn, remember, and celebrate the life that was taken. Norman was later laid to rest at Greenwood Cemetery. Funerals and memorials can offer a place for grief, but they cannot answer the questions left behind by a homicide. They cannot undo the violence or restore the future that was stolen. For those who loved Norman, his burial marked a painful farewell, but it did not erase the need for truth and accountability.

Publicly available reports did not name a suspect in Norman Clarence Manuel’s killing. No arrests, charges, trial proceedings, or convictions were reported in connection with his death based on the available information. After the homicide, Pittsburgh police continued investigating and asked anyone with information to contact homicide detectives. That lack of publicly reported resolution leaves his case marked by uncertainty, with loved ones left to mourn while also living with the burden of unanswered questions.

Norman’s story is not defined only by how he died. It is also defined by how he lived: as a writer, artist, student, fiancé, and loved member of his community. He was someone with imagination and ambition, someone who created stories and left pieces of himself behind through his work. His killing on Enright Court ended his life, but it did not erase the meaning of that life. The people who remember him continue to carry the image of a man who had a voice, a vision, and a heart connected to creativity. His death remains a painful reminder of the human cost of violence and of a life that deserved far more time.