Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP7617) and 3 other sources
In the coastal city of Virginia Beach, Virginia, the autumn of 2003 brought with it a mystery that has endured for years. On November 13th, 28-year-old Travis Ulmer Taylor, a man with brown hair and blue eyes, went about his day, never to be heard from again. Details regarding the specific timeline of his day are somewhat varied in public accounts. One report suggests he was last seen after having lunch at a Plaza Azteca restaurant in the Haygood Shopping Center, having left for work earlier that morning. Another simply states he was last seen in Virginia Beach on that day. At the time of his disappearance, Travis was described as being 5'9' and weighing approximately 138 pounds. His distinguishing features included scars on his forehead, left wrist, and left leg, as well as a tattoo of a piranha or some type of fish biting his nipple, though the specific side is unknown.

The days and weeks following November 13, 2003, turned into an agonizing stretch of silence for Travis Taylor's loved ones. The absence of any communication was deeply uncharacteristic, sparking immediate concern. As the investigation into his disappearance commenced, led by the Virginia Beach Police Department, a troubling lack of information became apparent. There were no clear indications of foul play, nor were there any signs that he had intended to leave his life behind. This scarcity of clues created a challenging path for law enforcement, leaving them with few avenues to pursue. The case, cataloged under the number 2003-076234, remained active, a persistent question mark in the files of the department.

Over the years, the investigation into Travis Taylor's whereabouts has remained open, a testament to the enduring hope of finding answers. Despite the passage of time, the details surrounding his last known movements are still sparse, and the narrative of what happened to him remains incomplete. The official missing persons case highlights the last date of contact as November 13, 2003, and the circumstances of his disappearance are succinctly noted as 'Last seen November 13, 2003.' For his family and the community, the lack of resolution is a heavy burden. The case serves as a somber reminder of the ambiguity and pain that often accompany long-term missing persons investigations, where the absence of information can be as daunting as the most challenging of evidence.

Last Seen: Nov 13, 2003

Possible Unidentified Matches (3)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

76%Possible
John Doe — Walstonburg, North Carolina
UP149408 • Found Oct 4, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 28–42 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 69%129 mi away
TimingFound 23 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7"–5'11" vs 5'9"
75%Possible
John Doe — Virginia Beach, Virginia - unidentified case UP13739
John Doe — Virginia Beach, Virginia
UP13739 • Found Mar 28, 2015
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 40–65 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%Same area, same county
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 84%5'2"–5'7" vs 5'9"
75%Possible
John Doe — Absecon, New Jersey - unidentified case UP1767
John Doe — Absecon, New Jersey
UP1767 • Found Feb 17, 2004
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 28
Race 100%White
Location 56%195 mi away
TimingFound 3 months after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'9"
Weight 65%175 lb vs 138 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.