Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP24658) and 2 other sources
On a summer day, July 6, 1991, 39-year-old Cheryl Laverne Grose vanished from Tigard, Oregon. She was at the Shilo Inn with her husband, Tom, who claimed she left of her own accord. Cheryl, a mother of five, has not been seen or heard from since that day. At the time of her disappearance, she was wearing a jungle-print t-shirt, green shorts, and white sandals. Described as a devoted mother by her friends, Cheryl was a housewife who did not own a car and had no independent financial resources. Following her disappearance, her husband informed their children that their mother had abandoned them.

The circumstances surrounding Cheryl's disappearance have long been viewed with suspicion by authorities. Despite her husband's account of her leaving voluntarily, investigators believe she was a victim of foul play. Her husband is considered a person of interest in her case. The investigation into her disappearance was officially reactivated in 2012, yet no charges have ever been filed in connection with her case. A friend of Cheryl's later revealed that she had been staying at a women's shelter in Multnomah County with three of her children in the week leading up to her disappearance. This same friend also noted that her husband did not contact any of her friends to inform them she was missing; they were only made aware of the situation when contacted by the Tigard Police in October of 1991.

Cheryl Grose's case remains an unsolved and painful mystery for her loved ones and the community. Born in Lake Stevens, Washington, she had previously resided in Tenino, Washington with her family. The official narrative provided by her husband has been questioned by both law enforcement and those who knew her well. The lack of any contact from Cheryl in the decades since she was last seen is a stark contrast to her described character as a dedicated mother. The investigation, though reignited, has yet to provide the answers needed to bring closure to her family. Her case stands as a testament to the enduring pain and uncertainty that surrounds a long-term missing person investigation, leaving a family without a wife and mother, and a community with unanswered questions.

Last Seen: Jul 6, 1991

Possible Unidentified Matches (4)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

87%Strong
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon - unidentified case UP9599
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon
UP9599 • Found Sep 7, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%7 mi away, same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'3"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 135 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon - unidentified case UP9936
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon
UP9936 • Found Oct 18, 1994
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 35–55 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%7 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 68%5'6" vs 5'3"
Weight 100%130 lb vs 135 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon
UP159082 • Found Apr 9, 2026
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 35–55 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%8 mi away, same state
TimingFound 35 years after last seen
Height 100%4'9"–5'3" vs 5'3"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon - unidentified case UP105256
Jane Doe — Portland, Oregon
UP105256 • Found Apr 24, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 28–42 vs 39 when missing
Race 60%Hispanic
Location 100%8 mi away, same state
TimingFound 32 years after last seen
Height 84%5'1" vs 5'3"
Weight 100%135 lb vs 135 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.