Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
On February 20, 2015, Marcus Rutter, 43, male, died in Van Buren, Missouri, after a violent confrontation inside his own family that left a small Carter County community trying to make sense of what had happened. In the days that followed, his name surfaced in public records of gun violence, while the deeper story unfolded through investigators and sworn testimony.

The account that emerged described a dispute between father and son that escalated quickly, drawing in Rutter’s partner, Tammy Cornman, when she tried to step between them. Authorities were told that Rutter produced a pistol and pressed it to Tammy Cornman’s head during the argument, turning a domestic clash into an immediate life-or-death crisis. In that moment, their son, Marcus Cornman, used a rifle and shot his father, and Rutter died from the gunshot.

As word spread, attention focused on whether the shooting was a crime or an act of defense. A Carter County deputy, Curtis Robinett, testified about what investigators had been told and what the scene suggested, and the case moved into the inquest process rather than a typical march toward prosecution. The public narrative did not revolve around a manhunt or unknown assailant; it centered on a known shooter—Rutter’s son—whose actions were weighed against the fear and urgency of the threat described.

In April 2015, a coroner’s jury heard the testimony and ruled that the killing was justified, finding that Marcus Cornman had acted in defense of his mother. The reporting of that verdict framed the outcome as a legal conclusion that the shooting was not criminal, and no charges, trial, or conviction were described in connection with Rutter’s death.

Later online memorial listings recorded the same date and place of death but did not add suspects, arrests, or courtroom proceedings beyond pointing back to news coverage and gun-violence data sources, leaving the jury’s finding as the clearest public endpoint of the case.