Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Daniel Naylor:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I find it curious how often we hear about missing persons cases being initially classified as runaways. It makes me wonder how many other cases out there might involve similar misjudgments. The fact that someone, possibly Daniel, went back to his house to grab personal belongings and cash adds a layer of complexity. Was it truly him, or could it have been someone trying to make it look like he ran away? The discovery of his bicycle hidden along the Alameda Creek Trail raises so many questions—was it his decision to leave it there, or was he possibly meeting someone at that spot? With the case being reopened in 2015, it seems like there might be more to this story than initially thought. I hope someone out there knows something that could help bring closure, not just for Daniel's family but for the community that’s been wondering all these years.
Does anyone else find it strange how the bike was hidden along the Alameda Creek Trail? It seems like whoever put it there didn’t want it to be found easily, but why not just take it or dump it somewhere it wouldn't be noticed? It’s like *someone* wanted to make it look like Daniel left on his own but didn't want to totally get rid of the bike for some reason. Has anyone heard if there were fingerprints or any other evidence found on the bike itself? It's been decades, and I'm wondering if new forensic techniques could reveal something missed back then. This case keeps haunting me with all these little details. Thoughts?