Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Kristin Snyder:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

Hey everyone, I've been following the Snyder case for a while, and there's something about that missing kayak that's been bugging me. I know it was handmade and hadn't been in the water for fifteen years before Amy disappeared. Given that it was not outfitted for flotation, is it possible she struggled with it right from the start? Or maybe it was all intentional—like, she chose something she knew wouldn't hold up?
Also, I'm wondering if anyone's considered the possibility of there being an accident due to the kayak’s old condition, even if she didn't explicitly intend for it to go down that way? Even the most experienced outdoors person might misjudge such a fragile piece of equipment, especially if she was in a distressed state of mind. Curious to hear everyone's thoughts on this angle.
Has anyone else looked into the kayak situation at Millers Landing around the time Snyder disappeared? It seems really odd to me that she took a kayak that hadn't been in water for 15 years. I'm trying to wrap my head around it: was she desperate, or was it possibly the only one available to her without drawing attention? I know the resort mentioned it would sink if tipped, but do we know if she was aware of that? Just trying to figure out if she had another plan that might not have involved the kayak at all. Also, local folks—any idea about the bay conditions during that time of year? Would love to hear your thoughts.
Hey everyone,
I was revisiting Ann Snyder's disappearance from 2003, and something about the kayak she might have used is really sticking with me. It seems like a crucial detail. Her car was found at Millers Landing, and they reported that the missing kayak had been out of the water for 15 years. If that kayak was truly as unreliable as mentioned, I wonder what would compel someone as experienced as Ann to choose it.
I mean, could she not borrow or rent a functional kayak easily from the resort? Maybe she didn’t want to be seen, but still, taking such a risky piece of equipment feels odd given her familiarity with kayaking. Was it about avoiding attention, or possibly something else? Also, did she have any particular connection to that kayak, or was it just the most accessible option at the time?
Thinking about this detail adds yet another layer to this mysterious case. If it was such a hazard, why take it? Would love to hear what you all think about this aspect of her story.
—Jasmine212