Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP75836) and 6 other sources
In the winter of 1968, a 37-year-old man named Gil Leite disappeared, leaving behind a life and a family in Bloomfield, Connecticut. The exact date of his last confirmed sighting is uncertain, believed to be either December 11th or December 12th. He was last seen at a bar called 'Barn' in the nearby city of Hartford. It is thought that he may have traveled back to Bloomfield that evening, but what happened from that point forward remains a mystery. A few days later, on December 15, 1968, his wife officially reported him missing to the authorities when he failed to return home. From that moment on, there has been no contact with his family or any recorded activity in his name.

At the time he vanished, Gil Leite was described as a Caucasian man, standing at 5 feet 4 inches tall and weighing approximately 140 pounds. He had brown hair, and green eyes, and a distinguishing scar on his left forearm. The investigation into his disappearance began promptly after he was reported missing, but despite the efforts of law enforcement, no substantial leads or evidence emerged to explain his sudden absence. The passage of time did not bring any clarity, and with no new information coming to light, the investigation eventually grew cold.

Decades have passed since Gil Leite was last seen, and his case is now considered a cold case. The circumstances surrounding his disappearance in December of 1968 are vague, with the narrative of his last known hours pieced together from limited information. He went to a bar in Hartford and may have headed home to Bloomfield, but vanished without a trace before his wife reported him missing a few days later. For over half a century, his family has lived with unanswered questions, and the case remains an unsolved mystery for the Bloomfield Police Department. The overview of this case is one of an abrupt and unexplained disappearance that has left a lasting void and a file that remains open, hoping for a breakthrough that might one day shed light on what happened to Gil Leite.

Last Seen: Dec 11, 1968

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

83%Moderate
John Doe — Saugerties, New York - unidentified case UP9819
John Doe — Saugerties, New York
UP9819 • Found Feb 1, 1970
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 85%65 mi away
TimingFound 14 months after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'4"
Weight 99%155 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Leominster, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15945
John Doe — Leominster, Massachusetts
UP15945 • Found May 15, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 63 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 84%69 mi away
TimingFound 37 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'4"
Weight 100%136 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 50%Blue vs Green
77%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP10330
John Doe — New York, New York
UP10330 • Found Oct 27, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%102 mi away
TimingFound 21 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'4"
Weight 99%125 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 70%Hazel vs Green
77%Possible
John Doe — Newark, New Jersey
UP1435 • Found May 4, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 74%107 mi away
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'4"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — North Attleborough, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15501
John Doe — North Attleborough, Massachusetts
UP15501 • Found Apr 11, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–50 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 83%71 mi away
TimingFound 38 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'4"
Weight 100%153 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Hastings-on-Hudson, New York - unidentified case UP80274
John Doe — Hastings-on-Hudson, New York
UP80274 • Found Apr 23, 1978
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–50 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 80%83 mi away
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'4"
Weight 100%154 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Green
76%Possible
John Doe — Denville, New Jersey
UP1524 • Found Oct 24, 1976
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 73%112 mi away
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5"–5'6" vs 5'4"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Worcester, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP12978
John Doe — Worcester, Massachusetts
UP12978 • Found Apr 20, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 70–72 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%56 mi away
TimingFound 40 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'4"
Weight 44%92 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
Eyes 50%Blue vs Green
75%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP6994
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP6994 • Found Feb 9, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 78%90 mi away
TimingFound 26 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'4"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Green
75%Possible
John Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP8029
John Doe — Queens, New York
UP8029 • Found Mar 16, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 37 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 77%95 mi away
TimingFound 24 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'4"
Weight 99%125 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Green

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.