Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP89799) and 7 other sources
In early 1983, Eileen Jay, a 27-year-old resident of Norwalk, Connecticut, found herself in a difficult period of her life. Having recently lost her job, she was understandably feeling depressed. Seeking a change of scenery and perhaps some solace, she made the decision to travel to New York City. On February 7, 1983, she packed a bag and left her home in Norwalk, heading for the city to stay with a friend who resided on West End Avenue in the vicinity of 100th Street. This trip was intended to be a temporary respite, a chance to clear her head and figure out her next steps after her recent job loss.

Eileen arrived at her friend's New York City apartment and settled in for her stay. According to her friend, the five days she spent there were peaceful; they did not have any disagreements, and Eileen gave no indication that she was planning to leave or had any specific destination in mind. The situation took an alarming turn on February 13, 1983. When her friend returned home from work that day, they discovered that Eileen was gone. She had vanished without a word, leaving her friend with no clues as to where she might have gone. At the time of her disappearance, Eileen was described as a biracial woman of Asian and Caucasian descent with brown hair and brown eyes. She was believed to be wearing a tweed suit and a raincoat and was carrying a cylindrical tote bag.

Following her sudden disappearance, Eileen Jay was never seen or heard from again. The Norwalk Police Department in her home state of Connecticut opened an investigation into her case. Despite the passage of several decades, her disappearance remains an active and unsolved cold case. The lack of information and the sudden nature of her departure have left her loved ones without answers. The overview of the case is that a young woman, facing a personal crisis after losing her job, traveled to a nearby city for support from a friend, only to vanish without a trace from that friend's home. The investigation continues, and authorities still seek any information that might shed light on what happened to Eileen Jay in February of 1983.

Last Seen: Feb 7, 1983

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

83%Moderate
Jane Doe — Medford, New York
UP13134 • Found Dec 7, 1994
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound 12 years after last seen
Height 100%5'1" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%135 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
82%Moderate
Jane Doe — Hackensack, New Jersey
UP1617 • Found Jul 19, 1992
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 93%35 mi away
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%137 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
82%Moderate
Jane Doe — Staten Island, New York - unidentified case UP6955
Jane Doe — Staten Island, New York
UP6955 • Found Sep 6, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 88%53 mi away
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 84%5'4" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%110 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP2771
Jane Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP2771 • Found Apr 7, 2004
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 92%39 mi away
TimingFound 21 years after last seen
Height 100%5'1" vs 5'2"
Weight 96%96 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP6051
Jane Doe — Queens, New York
UP6051 • Found Jun 6, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 94%32 mi away
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 100%5'1" vs 5'2"
Weight 98%138 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6124
Jane Doe — New York, New York
UP6124 • Found May 8, 1999
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 92%40 mi away
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%125 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6326
Jane Doe — New York, New York
UP6326 • Found Nov 9, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 23–33 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 93%36 mi away
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 84%5'0" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%105 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP6953
Jane Doe — Bronx, New York
UP6953 • Found Jul 7, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 86%Est. 35–45 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%115 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
Jane Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP2801
Jane Doe — Queens, New York
UP2801 • Found Jul 25, 2004
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 94%32 mi away
TimingFound 21 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%123 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
Jane Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP6020
Jane Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP6020 • Found Jan 30, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 45–70 vs 27 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 92%39 mi away
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 100%5'1" vs 5'2"
Weight 100%132 lb vs 110–125 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.