Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on 2 sources
In the late spring of 1987, a 43-year-old woman named Sandra Kay Runkle was residing in a program at a residential facility in the city of Niagara Falls, New York. On the evening of June 22nd, at approximately 7:00 PM, she was seen leaving the facility. Sandra was reported to have taken a cab to Prospect Point, a well-known location within Niagara Falls State Park that offers breathtaking views of the falls. At the time of her disappearance, Sandra was wearing dark blue pants, a red and white flowered shirt, and white sneakers. She was also known to carry a tan purse.

Sandra was described as a Caucasian female with brown hair and brown eyes, standing at 4 feet 11 inches tall and weighing between 170 and 185 pounds. She had several distinguishing physical features, including burn scars on her left elbow, as well as on her fingers and arms. Additionally, she had stretch marks on her torso. These details paint a picture of Sandra, a woman whose life took an unexpected turn on that June evening. Her case manager was the one to report that she had not returned, and since that taxi ride to the edge of the majestic falls, Sandra has not been seen or heard from again.

The circumstances surrounding Sandra's disappearance remain shrouded in mystery. Her intended destination, Prospect Point, is a bustling area frequented by tourists from all over the world, yet no confirmed sightings of her at that location have ever been reported. The lack of witnesses is a particularly puzzling aspect of this case. Despite the passage of many years, the investigation into what happened to Sandra Runkle continues. Hers is a story without a final chapter, a lingering question in the hearts of those who knew her and the community she left behind. The case serves as a somber reminder of the many individuals who vanish without a trace, leaving behind a legacy of unanswered questions and an enduring hope for resolution.

Last Seen: Jun 22, 1987

Links to Additional Sources (2)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

78%Possible
Jane Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP6119
Jane Doe — Queens, New York
UP6119 • Found Mar 17, 1999
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 12 years after last seen
Height 100%4'11" vs 4'11"
Weight 43%118 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention pant
78%Possible
Jane Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP7317
Jane Doe — New York, New York
UP7317 • Found Mar 14, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 40–50 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 100%4'11" vs 4'11"
Weight 80%145 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
Jane Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP6051
Jane Doe — Queens, New York
UP6051 • Found Jun 6, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 13 years after last seen
Height 84%5'1" vs 4'11"
Weight 72%138 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
Jane Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP4902
Jane Doe — New York, New York
UP4902 • Found Mar 2, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 84%4'9" vs 4'11"
Weight 100%163 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
Jane Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP7882
Jane Doe — Bronx, New York
UP7882 • Found Mar 19, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 30–50 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'0" vs 4'11"
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Clothing: both mention purse
77%Possible
Jane Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP8197
Jane Doe — Queens, New York
UP8197 • Found Feb 10, 1990
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 40–60 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 52%5'3" vs 4'11"
Weight 100%179 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention pant
77%Possible
Jane Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP6953
Jane Doe — Bronx, New York
UP6953 • Found Jul 7, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 68%5'2" vs 4'11"
Weight 38%115 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
Jane Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP79882
Jane Doe — New York, New York
UP79882 • Found Apr 18, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 55–70 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 34 years after last seen
Height 100%4'10" vs 4'11"
Weight 16%101 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention pant
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP6824
Jane Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP6824 • Found Sep 16, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 45–55 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 10 years after last seen
Height 84%5'1" vs 4'11"
Weight 91%155 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP8042
Jane Doe — Queens, New York
UP8042 • Found Jun 19, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 94%Est. 50–65 vs 43 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%Same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'0" vs 4'11"
Weight 69%135 lb vs 181 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.