Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP9714) and 4 other sources
In the winter of 1974, a young man named Edward 'Ed' Leroy Nichols vanished from the woods of northern Kentucky, leaving behind a mystery that would haunt his family and investigators for decades. On the morning of December 3rd, the 22-year-old left his parents' home in Florence to go deer hunting with a friend, David Stites. After stopping at a store for hunting socks, the pair headed to a wooded area known as Shady Nook Bottoms, near the Boone and Gallatin County line. According to Stites, he and Nichols separated with a plan to meet back at their car later that afternoon. Stites reported to police that when he returned to the vehicle at the agreed-upon time, Nichols was nowhere to be found. After waiting for four hours, Stites contacted the authorities, initiating a search and a case that would remain cold for nearly fifty years.

In the initial stages of the investigation, there was speculation that Nichols may have disappeared voluntarily. He was on probation for a drug charge at the time and had missed a meeting with his probation officer, which resulted in a warrant for his arrest. His hunting companion, David Stites, was fined for hunting out of season. Early on, police believed Nichols might be avoiding them, especially after two other hunters reported seeing a man they identified as Nichols, who fled from them. However, as days turned into years with no contact, the theory that he had simply run away became less plausible to his family and eventually to law enforcement. His sisters always maintained that he would not have voluntarily left and that they immediately felt something was wrong. The case eventually transitioned from a missing person investigation to a suspected homicide, though without Nichols' body, progress was stalled for many years.

Decades after his disappearance, new information brought a significant break in the long-stagnant case. In 2021, a family member of David Stites, the friend who had been with Nichols on the day he vanished, came forward with a story that changed the course of the investigation. According to this new witness, Stites had confided that another man in their hunting party, Bobby Franxman, was responsible for Nichols' death. The account detailed that Franxman and Nichols had gotten into an argument over a woman, which escalated to Franxman shooting Nichols in the face. Franxman then allegedly forced Stites to bury Nichols' body. This revelation led investigators to name Bobby Franxman, who died in 2007, as the primary suspect in the murder of Ed Nichols. Tragically, David Stites took his own life in 2022, the day before he was scheduled to testify before a grand jury. While a suspect has been identified, prosecutors cannot press charges against the deceased Franxman, and the remains of Edward Nichols have never been found, leaving his family with partial answers but still without the closure of laying him to rest. The case stands as a somber narrative of a young man who went hunting one morning and never came home, his disappearance remaining a painful void for his loved ones for over half a century until new testimony finally shed light on his probable final moments.

Last Seen: Dec 3, 1974

Possible Unidentified Matches (8)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%7 mi away, same state
TimingFound 24 years after last seen
Height 100%6'0" vs 6'0"
Weight 89%185 lb vs 160 lb
76%Possible
John Doe — Jeffersonville, Indiana
UP114481 • Found Apr 27, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 48–62 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 83%73 mi away
TimingFound 30 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 6'0"
Weight 93%138 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Erlanger, Kentucky - unidentified case UP76
John Doe — Erlanger, Kentucky
UP76 • Found Jan 25, 2003
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%7 mi away, same state
TimingFound 28 years after last seen
Height 84%6'2" vs 6'0"
76%Possible
John Doe — Cincinnati, Ohio - unidentified case UP7739
John Doe — Cincinnati, Ohio
UP7739 • Found Oct 27, 1988
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 99%14 mi away
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 52%5'8" vs 6'0"
Weight 91%137 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 0%Blue vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Richmond, Indiana
UP12980 • Found May 19, 1979
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 86%62 mi away
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 68%5'9" vs 6'0"
Weight 0%290 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Warsaw, Kentucky - unidentified case UP55760
John Doe — Warsaw, Kentucky
UP55760 • Found Feb 22, 2019
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 58–68 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 98%16 mi away, same state
TimingFound 44 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 6'0"
Weight 0%240 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Martinsville, Indiana - unidentified case UP14700
John Doe — Martinsville, Indiana
UP14700 • Found Sep 13, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 28–38 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 75%99 mi away
TimingFound 24 years after last seen
Height 100%6'0" vs 6'0"
Weight 100%170 lb vs 160 lb
75%Possible
John Doe — West Virginia
UP14232 • Found Jul 11, 1980
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 27–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 68%135 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 68%5'9" vs 6'0"
Weight 100%175 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.