Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP115557) and 4 other sources
In the early summer of 1982, the life of 29-year-old Phyllis Ann Maue was marked by personal turmoil. Residing in Norwood, Ohio, a suburb of Cincinnati, she was a mother to an 11-year-old son, and her marriage was experiencing significant strain. Amidst these difficulties, she had become involved in an affair with a man named Samuel 'Ray' Phillips. This relationship, however, was also a source of distress for Phyllis, as Phillips was known to have a violent temper, and she had grown fearful of him. Determined to make a change, she confided in a friend that she intended to end the affair. On the afternoon of June 25, 1982, Phyllis set out to meet with Phillips for this very reason. At approximately 2:00 p.m., a friend witnessed her getting into Phillips's light brown Chevrolet van just a block from her home. It was the last time anyone would report seeing Phyllis Maue. She was wearing a red pullover shirt, blue jeans, and gym shoes at the time of her disappearance.

The days following her disappearance only deepened the mystery and concern for her well-being. Phyllis had vanished without a trace, leaving behind all of her personal belongings, including her clothes and a paycheck she had yet to collect. Most troubling to her husband was that she had left her young son, something he firmly believed she would never have done willingly, especially given that her own mother had passed away when she was just a child. A perplexing clue emerged when her husband received a letter with a Cincinnati postmark from the day after she was last seen. The letter, purportedly from Phyllis, stated she was leaving for New York with a man she had recently met. A subsequent analysis by a handwriting expert brought a disturbing nuance to this piece of evidence; while the expert confirmed Phyllis had likely written the letter's contents, it was determined to have been done under a state of duress. Furthermore, the expert concluded that another person, likely Ray Phillips, had addressed the envelope.

When questioned by authorities, Ray Phillips denied having seen Phyllis at all during the week she went missing. Despite the suspicions surrounding him, he was never formally charged in connection with her disappearance and passed away in a car accident years later, in 2004. The investigation into what happened to Phyllis Maue has spanned decades, with law enforcement coming to suspect that she met with foul play. The Norwood Police Department has continued to hold the case, believing that her remains may be located somewhere in the local area. The case of Phyllis Maue is a somber tale of a young mother who disappeared under a cloud of suspicion, leaving behind a heartbroken family and a community with unanswered questions. The conflicting elements of her personal struggles, a fearful relationship, and a cryptic final letter have left a lasting and unresolved mystery.

Last Seen: Jun 25, 1982

Possible Unidentified Matches (2)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

75%Possible
Jane Doe — Littleton, West Virginia - unidentified case UP14234
Jane Doe — Littleton, West Virginia
UP14234 • Found Feb 13, 1983
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 97%Est. 30–45 vs 29
Race 100%White
Location 54%213 mi away
TimingFound 8 months after last seen
Height 84%5'6" vs 5'4"
Weight 95%135 lb vs 120 lb
Hair 100%Red vs Red
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Indiana
UP4847 • Found Feb 22, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 65%Est. 18–26 vs 29 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 91%42 mi away
TimingFound 20 months after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'4"

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.