Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP18030) and 8 other sources
Starr Maurie Hill, a 46-year-old woman, was last seen on May 18, 2005, in Middletown, California. On that day, Starr reportedly left her home on Western Mine Road after an argument with her husband, Curtis Hill. According to Curtis, Starr walked away during a rainstorm and headed toward town. She was last seen wearing a black leather jacket, a green sweater, and blue jeans. A friend reported seeing Starr walking along the road near Twin Pine Casino later that day.

Curtis claimed that he returned home from work the next day to find an angry note from Starr, indicating she had left him. Some of her personal items, including her purse and makeup bag, were missing. Despite previous instances where Starr had temporarily left following arguments, she always remained in contact with her family. This time, however, she did not reach out, raising concerns. Her daughter reported her missing on May 21, after several days without communication, which was highly unusual.

Searches were conducted, including the use of search dogs on the couple's 37-acre property, but no evidence of her whereabouts was found. In October 2005, five months after her disappearance, Starr’s cell phone was discovered in brush along Highway 29. However, the phone did not provide any new leads.

Although there were unconfirmed sightings of Starr in Colfax, California, and no definitive evidence of foul play, her case remains open. Investigators continue to consider her disappearance suspicious, and Curtis has been named a person of interest. However, no charges have been filed, and Starr’s case remains unsolved.

Her family continues to search for answers, and her case is classified as endangered missing.

Last Seen: May 18, 2005

Possible Unidentified Matches (5)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

79%Possible
Jane Doe — San Francisco, California
UP9160 • Found Apr 22, 2011
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 25–50 vs 46 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 83%70 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2" vs 5'3"–5'4"
Weight 100%125 lb vs 115–143 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 60%Brown vs Hazel
77%Possible
Jane Doe — San Francisco, California
UP7323 • Found Dec 23, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 50–75 vs 46 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 84%68 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3" vs 5'3"–5'4"
Weight 97%100 lb vs 115–143 lb
Hair 40%Gray vs Brown
76%Possible
Jane Doe — San Jose, California - unidentified case UP129724
Jane Doe — San Jose, California
UP129724 • Found Jan 23, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 58–72 vs 46 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 72%113 mi away, same state
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 100%5'3"–5'5" vs 5'3"–5'4"
Weight 100%120–125 lb vs 115–143 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 30%Blue vs Hazel
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Brisbane, California - unidentified case UP10944
Jane Doe — Brisbane, California
UP10944 • Found Jan 16, 2013
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 33–46 vs 46 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 82%74 mi away, same state
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'3"–5'4"
75%Possible
Jane Doe — San Francisco, California - unidentified case UP150119
Jane Doe — San Francisco, California
UP150119 • Found May 18, 2025
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 40–60 vs 46 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 84%67 mi away, same state
TimingFound 20 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4" vs 5'3"–5'4"
Weight 100%107 lb vs 115–143 lb
Hair 50%Red vs Brown
Eyes 70%Green vs Hazel

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.