Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP17618) and 5 other sources
Christopher Wayne Bailey, a 39-year-old man from Gaithersburg, Maryland, was last seen on August 25, 2006. He was reportedly walking shoeless along Route 270 in Montgomery County. According to sources, Bailey was suffering from an undiagnosed mental disorder, which may have contributed to his vulnerable state at the time of his disappearance. A family friend was the last known person to have seen him walking on that day.

Standing 5'9" and weighing around 170 pounds, Bailey is described as having black hair and brown eyes. Despite extensive efforts by law enforcement, including the Montgomery County Police, no significant leads have emerged regarding his whereabouts. His case remains open, and authorities continue to seek information that could lead to answers. His DNA is available for comparison, though no further identifiers or clues have been reported.

This case is still considered an endangered missing person situation, and anyone with information is encouraged to contact the Montgomery County Police.

Last Seen: Aug 25, 2006

Possible Unidentified Matches (8)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

80%Moderate
John Doe — Temple Hills, Maryland
UP12046 • Found Dec 27, 2013
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 40–60 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 95%28 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'9"
Weight 87%198 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
77%Possible
John Doe — Baltimore, Maryland - unidentified case UP112992
John Doe — Baltimore, Maryland
UP112992 • Found May 3, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 19–39 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 95%30 mi away, same state
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 68%5'6" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%156 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UP155373 • Found Feb 9, 2026
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 55–65 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 71%120 mi away
TimingFound 19 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'9"
Weight 86%141 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP6575
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP6575 • Found May 25, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–55 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 55%199 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
75%Possible
John Doe — Baltimore, Maryland
UP10110 • Found Jun 13, 2011
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 60%Est. 30–60 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 94%31 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 84%5'11" vs 5'9"
Weight 100%177 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 40%Gray vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Baltimore, Maryland - unidentified case UP10211
John Doe — Baltimore, Maryland
UP10211 • Found Jan 15, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 16–40 vs 39 when missing
Location 93%35 mi away, same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'9"
Weight 35%234 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Baltimore, Maryland
UP2905 • Found Jun 11, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 60%Est. 44–100 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 95%29 mi away, same state
TimingFound 22 months after last seen
Height 84%5'11" vs 5'9"
Hair 100%Black vs Black
75%Possible
John Doe — Urbana, Maryland
UP897 • Found Dec 1, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 55%Est. 50–100 vs 39 when missing
Race 100%Black
Location 99%14 mi away, same state
TimingFound 15 months after last seen
Height 84%5'11" vs 5'9"
Hair 100%Black vs Black

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.