Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP55105) and 5 other sources
Ralph A. Marsh was a 40-year-old white man from the Wiscasset, Maine, area whose life became the center of a long-unresolved missing person case in Lincoln County. Public case records describe him as approximately 5 feet 6 inches to 5 feet 7 inches tall and weighing about 165 to 180 pounds, with brown hair and brown eyes. His hair was described as a crew cut. On the day he was last known to have contact, he was reportedly wearing tan chino pants and a denim jacket, ordinary clothing that now stands as one of the few remaining details tied to his final known movements. His case is listed in NamUs as missing person case MP55105, with the Maine State Police Major Crimes Unit Central identified as the investigating agency.

The day Ralph disappeared began with a traceable routine. He was known to have been at work at the Wiscasset Lumbar Company until noon on October 23, 1965. After that, the account becomes narrower and more fragile, dependent on what was later reported about his afternoon and evening. Ralph allegedly spent the afternoon with three friends, traveling from Rockland to Gardiner and then back toward Sheepscot. By around 8 p.m., he was reportedly dropped off at the Four Corners in Sheepscot. That location became the last known point in his story: after being left there, Ralph was not known to be seen again.

The geography of the case places Ralph’s disappearance within coastal and midcoast Maine, connected by the route described from Rockland to Gardiner and back toward Sheepscot, near Wiscasset in Lincoln County. Online case summaries consistently identify Wiscasset, Maine, as the area associated with his disappearance, while the more specific account states that the last reported drop-off occurred at Four Corners in Sheepscot. The available public information does not describe a confirmed destination after that drop-off, nor does it provide a verified explanation for why Ralph was left there or where he intended to go next. What remains is a quiet but painful gap: a man who had worked earlier that day, spent time with others afterward, and then vanished after an evening stop along a local crossroads.

Ralph’s case was reported to law enforcement on October 26, 1965, three days after his last known contact, and it remains documented through public missing-person systems decades later. The Maine State Police missing-person information explains that Maine’s Office of Chief Medical Examiner uses NamUs to help track and manage missing-person case files, and NamUs describes itself as a national information clearinghouse and resource center for missing, unidentified, and unclaimed person cases. In Ralph’s case, that continued listing preserves his name, his identifying details, and the circumstances that are known, even though so many answers remain absent.

The passage of time has not lessened the human weight of Ralph Marsh’s disappearance. He was not only a case number or a set of measurements; he was a man whose ordinary Saturday in October 1965 ended in uncertainty for the people who knew him. The public record does not state that he has been found alive or deceased, and it does not provide a resolved explanation for what happened after he was dropped off around 8 p.m. at Four Corners in Sheepscot. The case, as publicly available records tell it, is the story of Ralph A. Marsh, age 40, last known to have worked in Wiscasset, traveled during the afternoon with three friends, returned to the Sheepscot area, and then disappeared from the known record after an evening drop-off, leaving behind a sparse but enduring trail that investigators and public databases continue to preserve.

Last Seen: Oct 23, 1965

Possible Unidentified Matches (6)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

80%Moderate
John Doe — Woolwich, Maine
UP99044 • Found Sep 3, 1986
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 40 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%9 mi away, same state
TimingFound 21 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2"–5'7" vs 5'6"–5'7"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Salem, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15219
John Doe — Salem, Massachusetts
UP15219 • Found Jan 13, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 60–61 vs 40 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 71%120 mi away
TimingFound 41 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'6"–5'7"
Weight 100%159 lb vs 165–180 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Leominster, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15942
John Doe — Leominster, Massachusetts
UP15942 • Found Jun 8, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 57 vs 40 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 66%147 mi away
TimingFound 41 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'6"–5'7"
Weight 100%192 lb vs 165–180 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Brookline, Massachusetts
UP16032 • Found Apr 1, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 77 vs 40 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 68%137 mi away
TimingFound 39 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'6"–5'7"
Weight 98%146 lb vs 165–180 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP15425
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts
UP15425 • Found Mar 2, 1982
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 40–50 vs 40 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 68%134 mi away
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'6"–5'7"
Weight 100%150 lb vs 165–180 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Cutler, Maine
UP81147 • Found Sep 8, 1972
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 93%Est. 48–62 vs 40 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 69%130 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'6"–5'7"
Weight 100%190 lb vs 165–180 lb

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.