295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Fredrick Smart: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Wow, it's been so long since Fredrick Smart went missing near Sheldon Point, and I can't help but wonder about the role that environment might have played in his case. I mean, Alaska's wilderness can be incredibly harsh and unpredictable. I've read that the waters around that area can be particularly treacherous, with strong currents and cold temperatures. It's easy to see how someone could get into trouble quickly, especially if he was out there alone. But the part I find confusing is that no remains or personal items were found. You would think something would have washed ashore or been discovered over the years, right? It just goes to show, I guess, how vast and unyielding the terrain can be. Anyone else have thoughts on how environmental factors might affect such investigations?
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Hey everyone, I've been looking into the disappearance of Fredrick Smart from back in 1987, and something's really baffling me. Has anyone else noticed how there seems to be no trace whatsoever—not even a piece of clothing or any of his personal belongings? It's so strange to me, especially since if he did drown, wouldn't at least something have washed ashore or been found by now, given the extensive search efforts? It makes me wonder if there's more to this story than meets the eye. Could it be possible that something else happened that prevented any evidence from being discovered? Would love to hear thoughts or any similar cases you've come across. Let's keep these conversations going and maybe we can uncover something new.
