298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Eric Robicheau: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
I've been reviewing some old missing persons cases and came across Eric Robicheau's story—it's such a mystery. One thing that caught my attention was his recent addition to the NamUs database in 2021. I wonder if anyone here knows why it took so long for his case to make it? Often, when cases are added to these databases, it can sometimes lead to new tips or jog someone's memory about that time. It makes me curious whether there's been any movement since his case was entered, even if small. If anyone has insights into how these databases work or any potential reasons for delays, I'd love to hear your thoughts or experiences. Maybe these slow-moving procedural aspects are crucial in keeping hope alive for longstanding cases like Eric's.
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Eric’s case has been perplexing for such a long time. Does anyone know if he had any particular friends or acquaintances in the Santa Monica or Venice area around the time he vanished? I read he was originally from Boston, so I wonder if perhaps any connections or friends from back home might have visited or kept in touch with him in California. It feels like someone out there might have a piece of information, but maybe they don't realize its significance. It's also curious how his case wasn't added to NamUs until 2021—that’s nearly three decades later! Why such a long delay? Was there some new development around that time, or was it just a part of routine efforts to revisit cold cases? It'd be interesting to see if that database entry has brought in any new insights or leads since then.
