Hey everyone, I’ve been following Pete Ulibarri’s case closely, and something that’s been bugging me is the lack of shell casings at the scene. I mean, it’s such an unusual detail in a drive-by shooting, right? It makes me wonder if the gunman used a revolver or if something else is at play here. Revolvers don’t eject casings, so that might explain it, but it feels strange given how drive-bys usually go down. This is just so tough for Pete’s family, especially when things seem at a standstill like this. I can't imagine what his wife Michelle and the kids are going through without any solid leads being reported. If anyone here has insights or theories about this kind of evidence, it’d be helpful to discuss. Maybe pooling ideas could lead to something new, even if it’s just bringing some clarity. Hoping for answers soon, for Pete’s family and the community. Stay safe out there.
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
I was reading through some details about Pete Ulibarri's case, and something struck me about the investigation—nothing was found at the crime scene in terms of shell casings. It makes me wonder if the shooter took extra measures to cover their tracks, or perhaps it's more common than I realize for evidence to be sparse in drive-by scenarios? It must be incredibly tough for Pete's family, not only dealing with their loss but also with knowing that answers seem so elusive. My thoughts are with Michelle, the kids, and the whole Ulibarri family as they search for justice. I hope someone with information can step up so they can find some form of peace and closure.
