Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Alice Huisenga:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the plea deal that Erika M. Haberberger-Dains took and how it played a role in this tragic situation. It’s frustrating to see her get a significantly lighter sentence compared to the severity of what happened to Alice Huisenga and Marvin Huesling. The fact that she is serving time for burglary and as an accessory after the fact just doesn't sit right with me, especially since she was part of the group that went to the farmstead.
However, perhaps her testimony is crucial to bringing justice against Chapman and Schenk. I can’t begin to imagine the anguish Alice’s family must be enduring knowing one of the accused received such a deal. Sure, these legal maneuvers are part and parcel of the justice system, but they must feel like a bitter pill to the victims' loved ones.
Does anyone out there have insights into how often these kinds of deals actually result in convictions for the more serious charges against other defendants? I genuinely hope Alice and Marvin's families find some peace through the ongoing proceedings.
Has anyone else been following the plea deal Erika Haberberger-Dains took? I just can't wrap my head around how someone could be part of such a horrible crime and then get a deal that might let them serve time concurrently. It feels like a slap in the face to Alice Huisenga's family, who must be searching for some semblance of justice in this nightmare. I can't imagine the pain they're going through, knowing that the person who was involved in their loved one's death could potentially serve such a short sentence. But on the other hand, her testimony is crucial for getting a conviction against the others. It's such a tricky, emotional situation. What are your thoughts?