Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Lana Lynn Lee:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I recently came across Lana Lynn Lee’s case from 1961 and couldn't stop thinking about the topography and how it might have affected the search efforts back then. Given the major changes in the area post-Glen Canyon Dam construction, I wonder how that impacted the ability of search teams to locate any remains or clues.
At the time, the flash flood occurred in Waheap Wash, and considering the pre-dam landscape, the water flow would have been quite different compared to today’s conditions. Older maps or photos could help us understand the route water might have taken and potential locations to search. I'm no expert, but if anyone has insights from an environmental or geological perspective, it would be interesting to know how natural changes might have hidden or moved crucial evidence over time.
I've been closely following the discussions about Lana Lynn Lee's tragic disappearance back in '61. Something that's really got me thinking is the timing with the Glen Canyon Dam construction. The dam wasn't completed until '63, so at the time Lana vanished, the river would have had a very different flow and landscape. Does anyone have any insight into how the geography of that area might have impacted the search efforts at the time? I've read that changing water levels can affect where or whether a body resurfaces, and I'm curious if that might have played a role in why Lana was never found. It's haunting. Would love to hear any historical accounts or thoughts on how the landscape might have shifted since then.