Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Michael Spangler:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I recently came across the case of Scott Spangler's tragic death on February 7, 1978, and couldn't help but think about what a terrible blow this must have been for his family and friends. The part that really puzzles me is the role of the 17-year-old juvenile in all of this. It's mind-boggling that after being arrested and extradited back to Ohio, the grand jury didn't find enough evidence to indict him for the murder.
How does such a suspect just slip through the cracks, especially given the apparent links, like the hitchhiking witness and the bag belonging to him found at the scene? It brings up so many questions about the evidence or perhaps lack thereof, despite what seems like pretty suspicious circumstances. It's so frustrating to imagine the anguish his loved ones have dealt with, not only losing a cherished person but also facing the uncertainty of justice not being served.
I hope that revisiting the case or bringing more attention to it might one day provide the closure they desperately need. If anyone has more information on why the grand jury didn't return an indictment or knows about any later developments, I'd be really interested to hear. It's a sad and baffling case that seems to have left too many questions unanswered.
The details of this case are so chilling, and my heart truly goes out to Spangler’s family and friends. I’ve been thinking about that strange detail of the floor stains being from battery acid. It seems so random, but could it have been an accidental spill during the break-in, or could it signal a more sinister intention, like trying to destroy evidence? The fact that a battery related to the juvenile was found outside makes me wonder if it was somehow part of the plan or if it was over-thought and something went wrong. It's bewildering to think that such a critical element found at the crime scene was connected to the juvenile, yet no indictment followed. How does a grand jury fail to find enough evidence with all these connections? For legal minds on the forum, how often does this sort of thing happen in murder cases, where clear connections aren't enough for an indictment? It’s just so unsettling that justice seems elusive in such a tragic case.