Has anyone else thought about the impact of ShotSpotter technology in cases like Fernando's? It's a relief that it alerted police so quickly—that 3:45 a.m. notification might have been crucial in getting to the scene. I remember reading that the longer a scene is unsecured, the more evidence can be lost or tampered with, especially in such chaotic settings. But I also wonder if these technologies can sometimes create a tunnel vision or urge to rush toward certain conclusions. Given the circumstances, I'm grateful for every tool that might bring justice, but I also hope the investigation remains open to any potential leads or anomalies. It's a reminder of how technology can be a double-edged sword—huge potential for good, but it requires careful, balanced use. My thoughts are really with Fernando's family; it's clear from all the tributes that he meant so much to so many people.
