Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for J.P. Henderson:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I've been reading about the case of J.P. Henderson, part of the tragic series of murders in Skid Row during '78 and '79. I find myself particularly interested in the evidence—or lack thereof—presented during Bobby Joe Maxwell's trial. From what I understand, prosecutors leaned heavily on circumstantial evidence, like a palm print and an entry referencing Satanic worship. But is that enough for such serious charges?
It's truly unsettling to think that someone might have been convicted largely on indirect evidence, especially with the vulnerable population involved. My thoughts go out to Henderson's family and all those who lost loved ones during that time. I hope discussions like these help shine a light on the importance of having solid, reliable evidence in criminal cases. Anyone else have thoughts on the use of circumstantial evidence here?
I've been doing some digging into the tragic murder of J.P. Henderson back in '78, and I think what's most chilling is how the investigation seemed to pivot largely on circumstantial evidence. It's haunting to think that there was no direct physical evidence tying Bobby Joe Maxwell to the crime, yet he was convicted. My heart goes out to Henderson’s family and friends—being part of a case that has so much uncertainty must be incredibly difficult. I wonder how much weight the courts give to intents like so-called "occult motives," especially when dealing with vulnerable victims. J.P. and the other victims deserved justice, but it's troubling to consider whether the right person was held accountable in the end. It’s crucial we continue to talk about mistakes like this to help prevent them in future investigations. Stay strong, everyone.