295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Denise Dorfman: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
I've been following Denise Holly Dorfman's case and can't stop thinking about that phone call to the university. It's always baffling when there's a potential lead like this, yet it goes nowhere. If it really was Denise, why call the university and not her family? And why only once? The fact that there was no follow-up raises so many questions. Could it have been someone impersonating her to throw off the investigation? Or maybe Denise was really planning to take a leave and something happened in between? I wonder if the call's specifics, like voice analysis or call tracing attempts, were ever fully explored at the time. Such a strange and haunting aspect of this mysterious disappearance...
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Hey everyone, I've been diving deep into the Denise Holly Dorfman case from 1980 and something that really stands out to me is that mysterious phone call to the university. Does anyone else think it's strange that Denise might have called them to say she was taking a leave of absence just days after her disappearance? It almost feels like it could've been a tactic to buy time or a red herring altogether. I can't shake the feeling that someone else might've made that call to throw off the investigation. There's no evidence it was her, and it seems like a crucial detail that's been overshadowed by other parts of the case. Has anyone come across similar tactics in other missing persons cases? Would love to hear your thoughts or theories on this angle!