298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Linda Skeek: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Has anyone else been intrigued by the role the calendar played in Linda Skeek's case? The note on January 1 saying "2:30 AM Linda walked off" just gives me chills. Given all the other evidence, it's suspicious at best, almost like a preemptive alibi or a way to direct the narrative. I've seen cases where perpetrators try to retrofit evidence to match their story. What's unsettling is the timeline seeming to line up with the neighbor's account of a loud argument. It feels too coincidental. Why would anyone jot that down at such an odd hour after such a tumultuous event? Seems like more than just a casual note to me. Curious to know what others make of it!
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Does anyone else find the notation on the calendar for January 1 suspicious? The fact it says "2:30 AM Linda walked off" doesn't sit right with me. It's almost as if someone wanted to lay the groundwork for a story about her leaving on her own. Could this have been a deliberate attempt to create a false narrative? The timing seems too coincidental, especially given the loud fight the neighbor reported that very night. All of this makes me wonder if Thomas was already planning his next steps and wanted to cover his tracks. Thoughts?
