295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Michael Schmidt: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Hey everyone, I've been following Michael Schmidt's case for a while, and I can't help but focus on the severe weather right after he went missing. That area near Brush Creek was hit hard by the storms that night. From what I've read, the water levels rose drastically, and the search teams had a tough time navigating the flooded fields and dense woods. I wonder if the flooding not only complicated the search efforts but also caused evidence to be washed away or hidden. Has there been any discussion about whether the weather could've moved any items he might've had with him, like his backpack or tools for arrowhead hunting? It seems that even the best search efforts might have missed something because of the conditions. It's just puzzling how with all those searchers, nothing tangible turned up. Would love to hear thoughts or if anyone has any additional info about that specific aspect of the search.
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
I’ve been following Michael Schmidt’s disappearance since the beginning, and I'm constantly struck by the challenges the search team faced. Has anyone looked into the exact impact of those 12-foot floodwaters on the search area immediately after it happened? That kind of rapid flooding could have altered the landscape significantly, right? I’m wondering if search teams might have overlooked areas that were temporarily inaccessible or too dangerous to search thoroughly at the time. With those early conditions being so hazardous, it almost feels like a needle in a haystack situation. It's so frustrating knowing those waters might have hidden important evidence or clues. Is there any update on whether they plan to search those areas now that conditions have hopefully stabilized?
