Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on 2 sources
In the spring of 1983, a young man named Mario Hudon vanished from the city of Lévis, Québec, leaving behind a life and a community that continues to seek answers. On May 16th of that year, the 29-year-old was seen for the last time. At the time of his disappearance, he was described as having a medium build, standing at approximately 1.73 meters tall and weighing 72 kilograms, with brown hair and brown eyes. His last known attire consisted of a white Makita brand jacket, along with a blue jean vest and pants. A distinguishing physical characteristic noted by authorities were burn scars on his wrists. His sudden disappearance launched an investigation by the Service de police de la ville de Lévis, who have since maintained an open file on his case, hoping for any information that might shed light on his whereabouts.

The years have stretched into decades, yet the void left by Mario Hudon's absence remains. For his family and friends, the passage of time has not diminished the pain of not knowing what became of him. The circumstances surrounding his disappearance are not widely publicized, leaving a narrative with many unanswered questions. Appeals for public assistance have been made over the years, with law enforcement encouraging anyone with even the smallest piece of information to come forward, emphasizing that all tips can be provided anonymously and will be treated with confidentiality. This long-standing plea for help underscores the enduring hope that someone, somewhere, holds the key to resolving this decades-old mystery.

The investigation into what happened to Mario Hudon is a quiet but persistent effort. The case represents the profound and lasting impact of a person's disappearance on their loved ones and the wider community. The lack of closure is a heavy burden to bear, a continuous state of uncertainty that those who knew him have had to endure for many years. This case is an ongoing appeal to the public's memory and conscience, a reminder that behind the name and the date is a human story that is still waiting for its final chapter. The overview of this case is that of a young man who disappeared from Lévis, Quebec, in the early 1980s, with few public leads to explain his sudden departure, leaving a lasting mystery for authorities and a perpetual sense of loss for his family.

Last Seen: May 16, 1983

Links to Additional Sources (2)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (9)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

77%Possible
John Doe — Malvern, Arkansas - unidentified case UP3123
John Doe — Malvern, Arkansas
UP3123 • Found Oct 18, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 29–30 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 17 months after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"
Weight 100%167 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention boot, sock, sweater
77%Possible
John Doe — Fort Washington, Maryland
UP1890 • Found Apr 6, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–39 vs 29–30
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 11 months after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'8"
Weight 100%175 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention sock, sweater
76%Possible
John Doe — Sacramento, California
UP2398 • Found Aug 11, 1986
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 29–30 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'8"
Weight 100%149 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention pant, sock
75%Possible
John Doe — Chicago, Illinois - unidentified case UP122451
John Doe — Chicago, Illinois
UP122451 • Found Sep 3, 1988
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 29–30 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'8"
Weight 91%182 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention boot, sock
75%Possible
John Doe — Winterhaven, California
UP15594 • Found Feb 16, 1986
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 29–30 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"
Weight 84%130 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention pant, sock
75%Possible
John Doe — Marina del Rey, California
UP4185 • Found Oct 9, 1985
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 29–30 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 84%5'10" vs 5'8"
Weight 100%145 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention pant, sock
75%Possible
John Doe — Denver, Colorado
UP7163 • Found Oct 16, 1983
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 29–30
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 5 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'8"
Weight 91%136 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention boot, pant, sock
75%Possible
John Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP12031 • Found Jun 15, 1983
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 29–30
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound 4 weeks after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'8"
Weight 100%155 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention sock
75%Possible
John Doe — Fort Smith, Arkansas
UP2848 • Found May 12, 1983
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 29–30
Race 100%White
Location 25%Different state
TimingFound same day as last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"
Weight 100%143 lb vs 159 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Clothing: both mention denim, sock

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.