Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP4) and 8 other sources
Mitchel Weiser, a 16-year-old from Brooklyn, New York, went missing on July 27, 1973, along with his 15-year-old girlfriend, Bonita Bickwit. The couple was last seen hitchhiking along State Route 97 near Narrowsburg, New York. They were on their way to attend the Summer Jam Festival at Watkins Glen, which drew over 800,000 people. Mitchel, who worked as a photography assistant, and Bonita, a mother's helper at Camp Wel-Met, were reportedly carrying backpacks, sleeping bags, and a sign reading "Watkins Glen" when they were picked up by a truck driver—the last person known to have seen them.

Initially, authorities speculated that the teens might have run away, but their families strongly refuted this, citing that both were from stable, middle-class Jewish families and had promising futures. Over the years, various theories emerged, including one from a man named Allyn Smith who, in 2000, claimed to have seen the couple drown in the Susquehanna River while on their way back from the concert. However, his account could not be fully verified, and many believe it remains inconclusive.

Despite several investigations and the involvement of multiple agencies, including the state attorney general in 2000, the case remains unsolved. The original files, which included crucial dental records, have been lost, further complicating efforts to find answers. Mitchel and Bonita's families continue to hope for a resolution, maintaining contact numbers in the event that either teen ever tries to reach out. Their case remains one of the oldest missing teen cases in the U.S.

Last Seen: Jul 27, 1973

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

79%Possible
John Doe — Monticello, New York - unidentified case UP9763
John Doe — Monticello, New York
UP9763 • Found Mar 22, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%19 mi away, same county
TimingFound 24 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Newark, New Jersey
UP1431 • Found Feb 21, 1985
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 27–39 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 82%76 mi away
TimingFound 12 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%150 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP7059
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP7059 • Found Dec 6, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 79%87 mi away, same state
TimingFound 22 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%145 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 60%Brown vs Hazel
78%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP8423
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP8423 • Found Dec 15, 1992
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 80%81 mi away, same state
TimingFound 19 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%130 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 60%Brown vs Hazel
78%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP10330
John Doe — New York, New York
UP10330 • Found Oct 27, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 80%82 mi away, same state
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 84%5'5" vs 5'7"
Weight 99%125 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Hazel vs Hazel
78%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP9079
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP9079 • Found Aug 2, 1988
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 79%87 mi away, same state
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 60%Brown vs Hazel
78%Possible
John Doe — New Jersey
UP1614 • Found Nov 28, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 22–26 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 84%69 mi away
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%130 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 50%Blond vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Manhattan, New York - unidentified case UP123278
John Doe — Manhattan, New York
UP123278 • Found Jun 19, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 81%79 mi away, same state
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"
Weight 99%155 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Bear Creek Township, Pennsylvania - unidentified case UP15764
John Doe — Bear Creek Township, Pennsylvania
UP15764 • Found May 28, 1979
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 17–22 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 90%45 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 68%5'10" vs 5'7"
Weight 60%180 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - unidentified case UP17493
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UP17493 • Found Jul 8, 1977
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 16–18 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 72%117 mi away
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 75%5'6"–6'1" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%140 lb vs 140 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.