Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP1070) and 2 other sources
In the small community of Oracle, Arizona, the disappearance of 32-year-old Troy Whyle Moncrief on January 11, 2000, left a lasting and sorrowful mystery. A man with blond hair and blue eyes, Troy was a familiar face at his job at the Oracle Metal Yard. On that Tuesday, he was seen at his place of employment, and then, he was gone. The days that followed his disappearance offered no solace or answers for his loved ones, only a growing sense of dread as he never made contact again.

The circumstances surrounding Troy's disappearance quickly pointed towards a grim possibility. A significant and alarming clue was discovered outside the metal yard where he worked: his wallet, completely empty. This discovery, coupled with the abrupt and total lack of communication from Troy, led investigators to suspect foul play was involved in his case. At the time he went missing, Troy was described as being 5'10' and weighing around 160 pounds. He had distinctive tattoos, one of Harley wings on his right arm and another on the left side of his chest. He was also known to wear a gold bracelet and a gold necklace.

Over two decades have passed since Troy Moncrief vanished, and his case remains an open wound for his family and the community. Despite the passage of time, the Pinal County Sheriff's Department continues to list him as an endangered missing person. The lack of significant leads or new information has left many questions unanswered, creating a painful void for those who knew and cared for him. The overview of the case is one of sudden and unexplained absence, a man disappearing from his workplace under suspicious circumstances, with only an empty wallet left behind as a haunting reminder of the day he was last seen.

Last Seen: Jan 11, 2000

Links to Additional Sources (2)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Mammoth vicinity, Arizona
UP6619 • Found Feb 18, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 23–35 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%11 mi away, same county
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'10"–6'0"
79%Possible
John Doe — Eloy, Arizona - unidentified case UP6332
John Doe — Eloy, Arizona
UP6332 • Found Sep 19, 2002
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 35–55 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 90%47 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'10"–6'0"
Hair 100%Blond vs Blond
79%Possible
John Doe — Nogales, Arizona - unidentified case UP7240
John Doe — Nogales, Arizona
UP7240 • Found Jul 17, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 32
Race 100%White
Location 78%88 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 months after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'10"–6'0"
77%Possible
John Doe — Phoenix, Arizona - unidentified case UP1971
John Doe — Phoenix, Arizona
UP1971 • Found Apr 7, 2001
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–40 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 77%95 mi away, same state
TimingFound 15 months after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"–6'0"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 160–170 lb
Hair 50%Brown vs Blond
Eyes 0%Brown vs Blue
76%Possible
John Doe — Eloy, Arizona
UP97199 • Found Jan 16, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 23–34 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 90%47 mi away, same county
TimingFound 22 years after last seen
Height 100%5'4"–5'9" vs 5'10"–6'0"
76%Possible
John Doe — Stanfield, Arizona - unidentified case UP10911
John Doe — Stanfield, Arizona
UP10911 • Found Dec 4, 2012
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 83%72 mi away, same county
TimingFound 13 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'10"–6'0"
76%Possible
John Doe — Amado, Arizona - unidentified case UP5466
John Doe — Amado, Arizona
UP5466 • Found Jul 12, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 22–34 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 85%65 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"–6'0"
Hair 50%Brown vs Blond
76%Possible
John Doe — Arizona
UP5481 • Found Apr 22, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 31–39 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 84%70 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"–6'0"
76%Possible
John Doe — Laveen, Arizona - unidentified case UP2028
John Doe — Laveen, Arizona
UP2028 • Found Nov 23, 2003
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 76%96 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%6'0" vs 5'10"–6'0"
Weight 88%196 lb vs 160–170 lb
Hair 50%Brown vs Blond
Eyes 0%Brown vs Blue
75%Possible
John Doe — Tucson, Arizona - unidentified case UP82870
John Doe — Tucson, Arizona
UP82870 • Found Jul 23, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 50–70 vs 32 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away, same state
TimingFound 22 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'10"–6'0"
Hair 70%Gray vs Blond

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.