Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP202) and 10 other sources
In the spring of 2000, a young man named Kinsey Maxfield Otto, then 24 years old, embarked on a trip from his home in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to the bustling city of Las Vegas, Nevada. He arrived by a Sun Country Airlines flight on May 13, 2000, at McCarran International Airport. Kinsey, who sometimes used the nickname 'Trent,' was described as a Caucasian male with light brown hair and blue eyes, standing around 5'11' and weighing about 150 pounds. He had several distinguishing features, including a pierced tongue and navel, and five small scars on his back from the removal of moles. When he left Minnesota, he was reportedly carrying a blue duffel bag and a significant amount of cash. Friends and family knew him as a devoted father to his young son, making his subsequent disappearance all the more puzzling and painful for those who knew him.

Kinsey's trip to Las Vegas was shrouded in circumstances that have since become central to the investigation into his disappearance. Authorities confirmed that after his arrival, he visited several clubs in the city. It is believed that the purpose of his trip was to engage in a large transaction for the drug Ecstasy. Prior to his trip, Kinsey had signed a modeling contract in Chicago and was hoping to finance his relocation to Illinois. Sometime after arriving in Las Vegas, he called his father, falsely claiming to be in Minneapolis visiting an injured friend. Investigators suspect this was a fabrication and that he was still in Las Vegas at the time of the call. It is believed that he met with a contact for the drug deal during his stay, but this individual, who had outstanding warrants for unrelated charges, has been uncooperative with the investigation.

The last trace of Kinsey Otto was his scheduled departure from Las Vegas. He was supposed to board a return flight to Minneapolis on May 19, 2000, but he never used his ticket. He has not been seen or heard from since. Law enforcement officials in both Nevada and Minnesota believe that foul play was involved in his case and that he may have been murdered in connection with the drug deal. His family maintains that he would not have voluntarily abandoned his son. Despite the passage of time, the investigation into Kinsey Maxfield Otto's disappearance remains open. His case is a somber reminder of the many unanswered questions that can linger for years in the wake of a person's vanishing, leaving a void for family and friends.

Last Seen: May 20, 2000

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

82%Moderate
John Doe — Las Vegas, Nevada
UP231 • Found Feb 25, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 25–50 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%3 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 100%181 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Nevada - unidentified case UP157
John Doe — Nevada
UP157 • Found Jul 28, 2002
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 60%Est. 30–60 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%11 mi away, same county
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 100%150 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 30%Hazel vs Blue
78%Possible
John Doe — Henderson, Nevada
UP104115 • Found Dec 22, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 38–52 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 99%15 mi away, same county
TimingFound 23 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'11"–6'1"
78%Possible
John Doe — Las Vegas, Nevada
UP240 • Found Jan 12, 2002
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 60%Est. 18–99 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%7 mi away, same county
TimingFound 20 months after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 53%101 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Lake Havasu City, Arizona - unidentified case UP12668
John Doe — Lake Havasu City, Arizona
UP12668 • Found Oct 7, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 24
Race 100%White
Location 69%129 mi away
TimingFound 5 months after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 100%150 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Las Vegas, Nevada - unidentified case UP387
John Doe — Las Vegas, Nevada
UP387 • Found Jun 25, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 25–45 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%11 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 68%5'8" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Nevada - unidentified case UP17836
John Doe — Nevada
UP17836 • Found Nov 7, 2017
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 60%Est. 18–100 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%10 mi away, same county
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 100%6'0" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 97%183 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue
76%Possible
John Doe — Nevada
UP15980 • Found Jul 13, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%10 mi away, same county
TimingFound 16 years after last seen
Height 75%5'7"–6'2" vs 5'11"–6'1"
76%Possible
John Doe — Winterhaven, California
UP13536 • Found Sep 4, 2001
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 51%242 mi away
TimingFound 16 months after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Las Vegas, Nevada - unidentified case UP11598
John Doe — Las Vegas, Nevada
UP11598 • Found Aug 29, 2013
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 81%Est. 40–60 vs 24 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%2 mi away, same county
TimingFound 13 years after last seen
Height 84%5'9" vs 5'11"–6'1"
Weight 100%141 lb vs 150–165 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Blue

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.