Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP500) and 6 other sources
On a warm summer evening in Wellton, Arizona, 35-year-old Neil Edward Deshazer was last seen on July 8, 2005. A recent transplant to the area from Oklahoma, Neil was at his home in the vicinity of Cecil and Boris Streets at approximately 10:30 p.m. According to accounts, he was seen walking from his residence and heading towards the vast, open desert that surrounded the community. Dressed in a green t-shirt, blue Levi's 501 jeans, and white athletic shoes, he seemingly vanished into the night and has not been seen or heard from since. Concerns for his well-being were heightened due to an unspecified medical condition he was known to have.

Neil was a man with a number of distinct physical characteristics that his loved ones hoped would aid in his identification. He had brown hair and brown eyes, stood between 5'7' and 5'9', and weighed approximately 180 to 190 pounds. His body bore several identifying marks, including a mole on his right cheek just under his eye, numerous moles across his back, and a collection of scars. These included a scar under the left side of his lower lip, another on his upper right leg, and one on his lower right arm. Additionally, Neil had two tattoos: a Harley Davidson emblem in black ink on his upper right arm and a heart on his upper middle left arm.

The investigation into Neil's disappearance was handled by the Yuma County Sheriff's Office. Despite the passage of time, his case remains an active and unsolved missing person investigation. The circumstances surrounding his disappearance are unsettling, as he left his home on foot and simply walked off into the desert landscape without a trace. Having only recently moved to Arizona, his social ties in the area may have been limited. The official record indicates a profound lack of leads, leaving his family and investigators with many unanswered questions about what could have happened to him after he walked away that night.

Last Seen: Jul 8, 2005

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

84%Moderate
John Doe — Winterhaven, California - unidentified case UP13113
John Doe — Winterhaven, California
UP13113 • Found Nov 8, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound 16 months after last seen
Height 84%5'11" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — Winterhaven, California - unidentified case UP13178
John Doe — Winterhaven, California
UP13178 • Found Jun 15, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 16–40 vs 35
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound same day as last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 93%155 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — Winterhaven, California
UP12608 • Found Sep 11, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 18–35 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
82%Moderate
John Doe — Calexico, California - unidentified case UP12621
John Doe — Calexico, California
UP12621 • Found Jul 3, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 81%79 mi away
TimingFound 24 months after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
John Doe — Winterhaven, California
UP15584 • Found May 30, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 64%130 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
John Doe — Calexico, California
UP12619 • Found May 17, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 17–35 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 81%79 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 100%170 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
John Doe — Yuma, Arizona - unidentified case UP13188
John Doe — Yuma, Arizona
UP13188 • Found Nov 4, 2014
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 94%31 mi away, same county
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 98%160 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
John Doe — Calexico, California
UP11876 • Found Oct 27, 2012
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 81%79 mi away
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 98%160 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
John Doe — Calapatria, California
UP12616 • Found Apr 27, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 79%85 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 100%180 lb vs 180–190 lb
80%Moderate
John Doe — Phoenix, Arizona - unidentified case UP819
John Doe — Phoenix, Arizona
UP819 • Found Aug 2, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 35 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 69%131 mi away, same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'7"–5'9"
Weight 93%155 lb vs 180–190 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.