Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP3367) and 6 other sources
On a fall morning in 1981, a 19-year-old college student named Charles Lewis Lassell, Jr. disappeared from a street corner in Old Mystic, Connecticut, leaving behind a mystery that has endured for decades. On October 27th, Charles's father dropped him off at his usual spot, the intersection of Jerry Browne Road and Coogan Boulevard, at approximately 7:30 a.m. From there, Charles was expected to catch a bus to attend his college classes, a routine part of his young life. However, on this particular day, he never got on that bus. Charles was never seen or heard from again, vanishing without a trace and leaving his family and community with unanswered questions. At the time of his disappearance, Charles was described as a white male with brown hair and blue eyes, standing at 6'2' and weighing around 190 pounds. A distinguishing feature was a scar on the outside corner of his right eye.

The immediate aftermath of Charles's disappearance prompted concern and a swift response from law enforcement. The Stonington Police Department was notified and began an investigation into his whereabouts. Search efforts were launched, and the community came together, hoping for any information that might lead to his discovery. Despite these efforts, the investigation faced significant challenges from the very beginning. There were no witnesses to what happened to Charles after his father drove away from the bus stop, leaving a critical gap in the timeline of his last known moments. The lack of any signs of a struggle or any evidence left at the scene made it difficult for investigators to determine if he had left voluntarily or if foul play was involved. The era in which he vanished, long before the widespread use of digital technology, meant there was no electronic footprint to follow.

Decades have now passed since Charles Lassell, Jr. was last seen. Theories about his disappearance have ranged from the possibility that he chose to start a new life elsewhere to the fear that he met with an accident or a more sinister fate. However, those who knew him found it difficult to believe he would have left without a word, citing his dedication to his studies and his family ties. With no new evidence or significant leads, his case has grown cold, yet it remains an open and haunting mystery for the Mystic community. The investigation by the Stonington Police Department remains active, a quiet testament to the hope that one day, answers will surface and provide closure to a family that has waited for an agonizingly long time. The case of Charles Lassell, Jr. serves as a somber reminder of a young man with a future ahead of him who vanished on an ordinary day, leaving a void and an enduring enigma.

Last Seen: Oct 27, 1981

Possible Unidentified Matches (9)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

79%Possible
John Doe — Medford, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP16439
John Doe — Medford, Massachusetts
UP16439 • Found Jul 25, 1984
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 20–40 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 79%86 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Weight 99%170 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Jersey City, New Jersey - unidentified case UP6785
John Doe — Jersey City, New Jersey
UP6785 • Found Jul 29, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 30–45 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 72%117 mi away
TimingFound 27 years after last seen
Height 100%6'2" vs 6'2"
Weight 100%209 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue
76%Possible
John Doe — Waterbury, Connecticut
UP94477 • Found Aug 13, 2022
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 48–62 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%58 mi away, same state
TimingFound 41 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7"–6'1" vs 6'2"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Methuen, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP14202
John Doe — Methuen, Massachusetts
UP14202 • Found Oct 28, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 74%103 mi away
TimingFound 19 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11"–6'5" vs 6'2"
Weight 94%165 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Westbrook, Connecticut
UP14439 • Found Sep 30, 1986
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 96%26 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
76%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP5641
John Doe — New York, New York
UP5641 • Found Nov 20, 2005
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 72%115 mi away
TimingFound 24 years after last seen
Height 100%6'3" vs 6'2"
Weight 96%167 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP7457
John Doe — New York, New York
UP7457 • Found Apr 29, 1991
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 72%113 mi away
TimingFound 10 years after last seen
Height 100%6'3" vs 6'2"
Weight 100%190 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Blue
75%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP7404
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP7404 • Found Aug 1, 1991
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 25–45 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 72%115 mi away
TimingFound 10 years after last seen
Height 84%6'0" vs 6'2"
Weight 88%160 lb vs 190 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Blue vs Blue
75%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP2277
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP2277 • Found Jul 8, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 74%105 mi away
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 100%6'1" vs 6'2"
Hair 60%Black vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.