Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP6568) and 10 other sources
In the spring of 1992, sixteen-year-old Ian Ashley Richardson disappeared from Denver, Colorado. He was last seen in the area of Lowell Boulevard and West 29th Avenue, a neighborhood he was known to frequent, along with the Idaho Springs area. At the time of his disappearance, he was described as being five feet ten inches tall and weighing approximately 150 pounds, with brown curly hair and brown eyes. The circumstances surrounding his vanishing were troubling from the outset, and as time passed without any contact, the case grew increasingly cold, leaving his family with unanswered questions and a void that could not be filled.

The investigation into Ian’s disappearance eventually focused on a man named John Taylor, a chemist in his forties at the time Ian went missing. Prior to his disappearance, Ian had a tumultuous and deeply disturbing relationship with Taylor. In 1991, Ian had reported to police that Taylor had been sexually abusing him for a couple of years. Charges were filed against Taylor for child sex abuse and harboring a runaway, but they were ultimately dismissed after Ian recanted his statement. Ian later confided in a counselor that Taylor had threatened him and his family if he were to testify. The situation escalated in 1992 when Ian accused Taylor of a shocking act of violence, leading to Ian allegedly assaulting Taylor and facing juvenile charges himself shortly before he vanished.

Years after Ian was last seen, new information surfaced that painted a grim picture of his likely fate. A friend of John Taylor's came forward to the police, claiming that Taylor had confessed to shooting Ian and disposing of his body. Despite this, Taylor has consistently maintained his innocence in Ian's disappearance, suggesting that he is being framed and that Ian may have taken his own life. In a separate case in 2009, Taylor pleaded guilty to sexually abusing two other boys and was sentenced to prison. Foul play is strongly suspected in Ian's case, which remains an unsolved and painful mystery. The official investigation into what happened to Ian Richardson continues, a somber reminder of a young life interrupted and a family left waiting for answers.

Last Seen: Apr 30, 1992

Possible Unidentified Matches (4)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

83%Moderate
John Doe — Denver, Colorado - unidentified case UP7173
John Doe — Denver, Colorado
UP7173 • Found Jan 8, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–25 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%4 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 68%5'7" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
82%Moderate
John Doe — Fort Collins, Colorado - unidentified case UP454
John Doe — Fort Collins, Colorado
UP454 • Found Jul 12, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%56 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Fort Lupton, Colorado
UP71876 • Found Aug 12, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 16 when missing
Location 96%25 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 84%5'4"–5'8" vs 5'10"
Weight 47%100 lb vs 150 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
75%Possible
John Doe — Glendale, Colorado - unidentified case UP11476
John Doe — Glendale, Colorado
UP11476 • Found Feb 10, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 62%Est. 25–30 vs 16 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 100%8 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"
Weight 54%196 lb vs 150 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.