Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP13657) and 8 other sources
John Leo Simonelli was 21 years old when he was last seen in Pawtucket, Rhode Island, on July 11, 1994. Public missing-person listings identify him as a White/Caucasian male and connect the case to NamUs number MP13657. The available public summaries do not describe the specific circumstances leading up to his disappearance, leaving the timeline sparse and the unanswered questions especially painful for those who knew and loved him.

At the time he disappeared, John was described as being between 5 feet 8 inches and 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighing approximately 165 to 170 pounds. He had black hair and brown eyes. One notable identifying feature listed for him is a tattoo of a gorilla on his left arm. He was reportedly wearing blue jeans and a white T-shirt when last seen, and the available case information indicates that no vehicle was associated with his disappearance.

The case is listed as having been reported to the Rhode Island State Police, with public case materials identifying Pawtucket in Providence County as the last known location. NamUs is a national clearinghouse for missing, unidentified, and unclaimed person cases, and John’s listing remains part of that public missing-person record.

Because the publicly available details are limited, John’s case remains defined by both the few facts that are known and the long absence of answers. More than three decades have passed since he was last seen, but his name, description, and identifying details continue to be shared so that anyone who may remember something from July 1994, or who may have learned information later, can still help bring clarity to his family and to the investigators responsible for his case.

Last Seen: Jul 11, 1994

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

78%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6049
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6049 • Found May 15, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 64%155 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 81%132 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP5717
John Doe — New York, New York
UP5717 • Found May 30, 2003
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 99%Est. 30–40 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 63%158 mi away
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 100%167 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP5789
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP5789 • Found Oct 16, 2002
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 66%147 mi away
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 58%116 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6071
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6071 • Found Aug 8, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 88%Est. 16–20 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 64%154 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 100%156 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP6047
John Doe — New York, New York
UP6047 • Found May 1, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 64%155 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 100%154 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP7267
John Doe — New York, New York
UP7267 • Found Aug 31, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–25 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 64%154 mi away
TimingFound 14 months after last seen
Height 84%5'6" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 56%115 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts - unidentified case UP16102
John Doe — Boston, Massachusetts
UP16102 • Found Feb 25, 1996
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 60%Est. 18–100 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 93%38 mi away
TimingFound 20 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 100%162 lb vs 165–170 lb
76%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP8825
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP8825 • Found Mar 16, 2011
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 64%156 mi away
TimingFound 17 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 100%168 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP5230
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP5230 • Found May 30, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 63%158 mi away
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 75%127 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
76%Possible
John Doe — Cornwall, New York - unidentified case UP9820
John Doe — Cornwall, New York
UP9820 • Found Mar 19, 2001
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 21 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 67%140 mi away
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'8"–5'10"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 165–170 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.