Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP20871) and 1 other source
In June of 2006, a 19-year-old man named Orlando Jose Garcia Fernandez vanished while attempting to cross the border into the United States. Originally from an unspecified location, Orlando had made his way to Tijuana, Mexico, with the intention of entering Arizona. The last contact anyone had with him was a phone call he made from Tijuana, in which he stated his plans to cross the border. He was not alone in this endeavor; he was reportedly traveling with another individual and had enlisted the help of a 'coyote,' or human smuggler, who was driving a red truck. His journey was to take him across the U.S.-Mexico border and into the vast desert landscape of Pima County, Arizona.

The circumstances surrounding Orlando's disappearance are fraught with the inherent dangers of clandestine border crossings. Traveling through the harsh and unforgiving terrain of the Arizona desert presents numerous risks, from the extreme climate to the potential for encountering dangerous individuals. It is known that he was in the company of a smuggler and at least one other person, but there is no information available about what became of his traveling companion or the 'coyote' who was guiding them. The details of what transpired after he entered the United States remain a mystery, and the Pima County Sheriff's Department is the investigating agency in his case.

Orlando is described as a Hispanic male with black hair and brown eyes. At the time of his disappearance, he stood between 5'8' and 6'0' tall and weighed approximately 170 pounds. He has several distinguishing physical features, including a scar on his right palm and another on the back of his head. Additionally, he has a colorful tattoo of a dog, about five inches in size, on his left thigh. When he was last seen, it is believed he was wearing size 10 shoes and was carrying documents with him. The case of Orlando Garcia Fernandez is a somber reminder of the perils faced by many who attempt to cross the border, and for his family, it is a story without an ending, a long and painful period of not knowing the fate of their loved one.

Last Seen: Jun 17, 2006

Links to Additional Sources (1)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Tucson, Arizona - unidentified case UP8671
John Doe — Tucson, Arizona
UP8671 • Found Jan 25, 2010
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–29 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 70%126 mi away, same county
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Weight 100%155 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
81%Moderate
John Doe — Maricopa, Arizona - unidentified case UP6045
John Doe — Maricopa, Arizona
UP6045 • Found Mar 29, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 15–21 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 78%88 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Weight 58%120 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
John Doe — Tucson, Arizona - unidentified case UP4904
John Doe — Tucson, Arizona
UP4904 • Found Aug 1, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 15–23 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 70%126 mi away, same county
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Weight 100%175 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
79%Possible
John Doe — Arizona - unidentified case UP75357
John Doe — Arizona
UP75357 • Found Jul 24, 2020
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–22 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 100%Same area, same county
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 52%5'4" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Weight 79%120–135 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Stanfield, Arizona - unidentified case UP4934
John Doe — Stanfield, Arizona
UP4934 • Found Feb 11, 2007
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 17–21 vs 19
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 76%95 mi away, same state
TimingFound 8 months after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Weight 38%108 lb vs 170 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
77%Possible
John Doe — Casa Grande, Arizona - unidentified case UP6370
John Doe — Casa Grande, Arizona
UP6370 • Found Jul 22, 2009
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 89%Est. 23–32 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 78%88 mi away, same state
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7"–5'8" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Hair 100%Black vs Black
77%Possible
John Doe — Arizona City, Arizona - unidentified case UP5086
John Doe — Arizona City, Arizona
UP5086 • Found Dec 3, 2008
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 76%95 mi away, same state
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%6'0" vs 5'8"–6'0"
76%Possible
John Doe — Gila Bend, Arizona - unidentified case UP12852
John Doe — Gila Bend, Arizona
UP12852 • Found Jul 6, 2014
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–25 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 71%121 mi away, same state
TimingFound 8 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Hair 100%Black vs Black
76%Possible
John Doe — Gila Bend, Arizona - unidentified case UP12560
John Doe — Gila Bend, Arizona
UP12560 • Found Nov 1, 2013
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–24 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 71%121 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'11" vs 5'8"–6'0"
Hair 100%Black vs Black
76%Possible
John Doe — Arizona - unidentified case UP12091
John Doe — Arizona
UP12091 • Found Sep 24, 2013
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 23–38 vs 19 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 79%86 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'8"–6'0"

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.