Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP30894) and 11 other sources
In the spring of 1985, 28-year-old Cindy Louise Moore, a female resident of Troy, Michigan, was embarking on a new chapter in her life. She was a dedicated mother to her two-year-old son and was in the process of divorcing her estranged husband. With plans to create a new home for herself and her child, she had even put a down payment on a mobile home in Auburn Hills. However, her aspirations for the future were abruptly halted on the night of May 23, 1985. After finishing her shift at the post office where she worked in Troy at approximately 11:00 p.m., she was seen driving her silver and black 1984 Ford Tempo. A coworker spotted her near the intersection of 14 Mile Road and I-75 around 11:15 p.m. Cindy was en route to her estranged husband's residence in Warren to pick up their son, with the intention of then taking him to her parents' home in Independence Township where she had been staying. Tragically, she never arrived at either destination and has not been seen or heard from since.

The initial days following Cindy's disappearance yielded few clues. A week after she was last seen, her Ford Tempo was discovered abandoned in the parking lot of a Red Roof Inn located at 14 Mile Road and John R in Madison Heights. Investigators determined the vehicle had been parked there since the day after her disappearance. The car was locked, her keys were missing, and there were no signs of a struggle or any foul play within the vehicle. Back at her parents' home, all of her personal belongings, including her clothing, remained untouched. Furthermore, her bank account has shown no activity since the day she vanished. The lack of any discernible crime scene left investigators with a perplexing mystery.

Authorities have long suspected foul play in Cindy's disappearance. Her estranged husband was considered a person of interest in the case, particularly after it was revealed that Cindy had previously claimed he had assaulted her during arguments. He reportedly admitted to assaulting his wife during a dispute. Shortly after she went missing, her husband filled in the swimming pool at his home. This action raised suspicions, and in 1992, police excavated the pool and the surrounding backyard in search of any evidence, but their efforts were fruitless. Despite the suspicions, he was never arrested or charged in connection with her disappearance. The case eventually went cold, leaving her family with unanswered questions and a profound sense of loss. Years later, law enforcement continues to seek information from the public, hoping that someone with knowledge of the events of that night will come forward to provide closure for Cindy's loved ones. The Oakland County Sheriff's Office has urged anyone with even the smallest detail to contact them, believing that a tip from the public is the most likely way this long-standing case will be solved.

Last Seen: May 23, 1985

Possible Unidentified Matches (8)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan - unidentified case UP12001
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP12001 • Found Nov 29, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away, same state
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'7"
Hair 50%Blond vs Brown
81%Moderate
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan - unidentified case UP11897
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP11897 • Found Nov 2, 1989
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 19–29 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 100%120 lb vs 115 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Green
79%Possible
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP81190 • Found Nov 7, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 40–60 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away, same state
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 100%5'2"–5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 92%99 lb vs 115 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 50%Blue vs Green
79%Possible
Jane Doe — Newport, Michigan - unidentified case UP8501
Jane Doe — Newport, Michigan
UP8501 • Found Feb 23, 1992
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 32–52 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 91%43 mi away, same state
TimingFound 7 years after last seen
Height 100%5'8" vs 5'7"
Weight 77%140 lb vs 115 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
77%Possible
Jane Doe — Highland Park, Michigan
UP12327 • Found Jun 7, 2003
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 77%Est. 50–70 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 99%14 mi away, same state
TimingFound 18 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 96%129 lb vs 115 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
Eyes 50%Blue vs Green
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan - unidentified case UP85813
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP85813 • Found Jan 28, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 85%Est. 60–80 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away, same state
TimingFound 36 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'7"
Weight 75%141 lb vs 115 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
76%Possible
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP150506 • Found Sep 17, 2025
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 38–52 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away, same state
TimingFound 40 years after last seen
Height 84%5'5" vs 5'7"
Weight 62%147 lb vs 115 lb
Hair 70%Gray vs Brown
75%Possible
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan - unidentified case UP8283
Jane Doe — Detroit, Michigan
UP8283 • Found Sep 21, 2000
View case
Sex ✓Female
Age 100%Est. 35–45 vs 28 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away, same state
TimingFound 15 years after last seen
Height 84%5'2"–5'5" vs 5'7"
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 0%Brown vs Green

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.