Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP27838) and 5 other sources
In the late afternoon of January 9, 2015, the life of 36-year-old Ivan Mercado of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, took a tragic and mysterious turn. At approximately 4:50 PM, Mercado was seen stopping his vehicle on the northbound side of the Edison Bridge, a span that carries Route 9 across the Raritan River, connecting Woodbridge and Sayreville. Eyewitnesses reported the distressing sight of Mercado getting out of his car and then jumping into the river below. At the time he went missing, Ivan Mercado was described as a white male, standing 5 feet 10 inches tall and weighing about 160 pounds, with brown hair and brown eyes. He was last seen wearing a black jacket and black pants, and he had a distinctive gold hoop earring in his right ear.

The immediate aftermath of the incident saw a swift response from local authorities, led by the Sayreville Police Department. A search and rescue operation was launched in the cold waters of the Raritan River, a challenging environment given the time of year. Emergency crews scoured the river and its banks, hoping to find any sign of Mercado. The initial, intensive search efforts, however, were unfortunately not successful in locating him. The conditions of the river and the nature of the event presented significant obstacles to the search teams. As time passed without any positive developments, the active search had to be scaled back, leaving a painful void and many unanswered questions for his family and the community.

Since that day, the case of Ivan Mercado has remained open, a heart-wrenching puzzle with a missing piece. His disappearance is officially documented, and his information is registered in national missing persons' databases like NamUs under case number MP27838. The Sayreville Police Department is the primary investigating agency, and the case awaits any new information or evidence that might bring clarity to what happened. The overview of this case is one of profound sadness and uncertainty; a man was witnessed taking a desperate action from a bridge, which initiated a significant but ultimately unsuccessful search, leaving his final whereabouts unknown and his loved ones without closure.

Last Seen: Jan 9, 2015

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

81%Moderate
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - unidentified case UP16496
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UP16496 • Found Feb 11, 2017
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%57 mi away
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7"–5'10" vs 5'10"
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UP70353 • Found May 7, 2020
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 35–50 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 86%62 mi away
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%166 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
80%Moderate
John Doe — Lakewood, New Jersey
UP16881 • Found Jul 31, 2016
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 30–50 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away, same state
TimingFound 19 months after last seen
Height 68%5'7" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%160 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP81157
John Doe — Queens, New York
UP81157 • Found May 26, 2021
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 35–55 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 95%29 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 84%5'8" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%168 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 60%Hazel vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — New York, New York - unidentified case UP50249
John Doe — New York, New York
UP50249 • Found Apr 24, 2018
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 64%Est. 45–65 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 97%20 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 100%5'10" vs 5'10"
Weight 99%177 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UP55994 • Found Sep 22, 2017
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 85%Est. 30–50 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%57 mi away
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 84%5'6"–5'8" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%160–180 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
79%Possible
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - unidentified case UP151698
John Doe — Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
UP151698 • Found Oct 13, 2025
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 45–60 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 87%58 mi away
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 84%5'6"–5'8" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%150–155 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 60%Hazel vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Queens, New York - unidentified case UP115204
John Doe — Queens, New York
UP115204 • Found Dec 26, 2023
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 45–55 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 96%27 mi away
TimingFound 9 years after last seen
Height 52%5'6" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%147 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York - unidentified case UP75991
John Doe — Brooklyn, New York
UP75991 • Found Nov 19, 2020
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 54%Est. 50–75 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 98%19 mi away
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'9" vs 5'10"
Weight 99%143 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 100%Brown vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
78%Possible
John Doe — Bronx, New York - unidentified case UP16717
John Doe — Bronx, New York
UP16717 • Found May 11, 2017
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–40 vs 36 when missing
Race 100%White
Location 94%31 mi away
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 36%5'5" vs 5'10"
Weight 100%171 lb vs 160 lb
Hair 60%Black vs Brown
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.