298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Robert Pierce: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Has anyone else noticed how certain details about Robert Pierce's case seem to be missing from the public record? It's been almost two decades, and we're still left with a bunch of questions. For instance, why was Robert on the 59th Street Bridge that day? Was it a usual route he took, or does anyone know if he mentioned anything about going to Queens? Also, I’ve read that there were no signs of foul play, but I'm curious if anyone knows if they checked the bridge for any surveillance footage from that time? Back in 2004, maybe there weren't as many cameras as today, but it’s still something I've wondered about. If anyone has insights or theories, I'm all ears. This case has been on my mind lately, and I'd love to hear what others think might have happened.
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Hey everyone, I've been following Robert Pierce's case for a while, and something that's been on my mind is the location where he was last seen—the 59th Street Bridge. It's such a busy area with tons of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. Has anyone looked into whether there were street cameras or even traffic cameras there back in 2004 that could've captured anything? I know it's a long shot, but even low-res footage might offer some clues, right? So frustrating that despite such a public last seen location, there's so little to go on. What do you guys think about looking into this angle?
