Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for David Blockett:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

Hey everyone, I've been digging into the case of David Ezell Blockett and came across an interesting point I hadn't thought deeply about before: the use of local birth announcements.
Back in 1980, it wasn't uncommon for birth announcements to appear in local newspapers, which might have given "Marie Kelly" all the information she needed to target David's family. Imagine how easy it would have been for someone with ill intentions to scan through those announcements for a potential victim. It makes you wonder how much public information like this could have inadvertently contributed to such a tragic event.
Do you think there were systems or precautions that could have been implemented back then to prevent access to such personal details? I'd love to hear any thoughts or similar cases where public information was misused this way.
I’ve been wondering about something that doesn’t seem to get much attention in David Blockett's case—the role of birth announcements back then. It struck me how "Marie Kelly" might have obtained info about David’s family. Back in the '80s, these announcements were public and often detailed, offering names, birthdates, and sometimes even the parents' addresses. It's chilling to think that such innocent information available to everyone could have been used with such malicious intent.
Does anyone know if there were similar abductions around that time linked to birth announcement listings? It seems like such an easy way for someone with ill intentions to take advantage. I wonder if investigators looked into whether there were patterns of such abductions, or if this was an isolated incident. It’s a somber reminder of how careful we need to be with information we share.