Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Shemaeah Gunnel:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

Has anyone else been looking into the parole system and how Kiles was released just four months before these tragic events? It’s puzzling to me that despite his history and ongoing issues with substance abuse, his parole officer reported satisfactory conduct. Makes me wonder if there were any warning signs that were missed or ignored. How rigorous is the counseling and monitoring for someone like Kiles supposed to be? It’s unsettling to think about how parole and oversight might have played a role in this case. Would love to hear any insights or similar cases you all might know where the system seemed to have failed.
Does anyone else find it odd that Kiles confessed to multiple people almost immediately after the incident? I mean, he even took his neighbor to see Valerie's body? It's such a risky move for someone who just committed a murder. Could this suggest some sort of mental break or desperation for attention on his part? I've read about cases where offenders seem almost compelled to confess, either out of guilt or as if claiming some twisted "prize" for what they've done. I wonder if he had a moment where the gravity of his actions truly hit him, or was he just too high to care about getting caught? The whole situation is incredibly baffling. Does anyone know if his parole officer ever testified at the trial?
I recently came across the tragic case of Shemaeah and her family, and there's something that's been bugging me. Alvie Copeland Kiles claimed his actions weren't premeditated, yet he confessed to multiple people immediately after the murders. Why would someone instantly admit to something so heinous if it was truly spur-of-the-moment? It's almost as if he was seeking some sort of validation or trying to create a narrative to sway opinions about his mental state during the crimes. Does anyone else find this behavior conflicting or suspicious? Plus, the fact that he felt the need to show a neighbor the body right after seems more like the actions of someone who wanted to exert control over the situation, like he couldn't help but share his "achievement" in some twisted way. This part of the case feels off to me, and I'm curious about others' thoughts.