298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Patricia Krieger: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Hey everyone, I've been reading up on the Patti Krieger case lately, and something about the circumstances on Sauk Mountain really nags at me. It's odd, don't you think, that during a group hike with multiple people, no one decided to follow Patti or check in on her path? I understand that hikes can get casual, and sometimes people take different trails, but in such remote conditions, it feels risky to not maintain visual contact or at least regroup periodically. I've also been curious about the dog's behavior. Bear was found three weeks later, still on the mountain, which suggests loyalty, but why didn't he manage to find his way back to the other hikers or even down the mountain? Some dogs have incredible homing instincts. It just adds another layer to this already bizarre situation. Does anyone else think the group's initial response was a bit nonchalant, or am I reading too much into it? Maybe those who go hiking can weigh in on how typical this kind of separation is during a hike? Looking forward to your thoughts!
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
I've been diving into the case of Patricia "Patti" Krieger's disappearance and something keeps nagging at me. Has anyone else looked into the background of Sauk Mountain itself? I found it interesting how treacherous the terrain can be, especially for someone who isn't a seasoned hiker. The paths can be confusing, and if Patti veered off without the right gear, it could have been easy to get lost. But here's my question: did anyone ever map out other possible trails she could have taken or check if there were any recent reports of strange activity on the mountain during that time? It makes me wonder if her veering off might’ve not just been her taking a different path, but possibly trying to avoid something or someone. Thoughts?
