Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
298 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Miguel Perez:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

Has anyone else looked into the area Miguel Perez was last known to frequent? I was curious if there's anything significant about that part of Paterson that could give us more context? Sometimes, certain places hold personal meaning or connections. Also, is there a nearby spot he might have gone to work or a friend's house he might visit often? Any locals with insights about the area, or who might have seen or heard something around the time he vanished, could really help paint a better picture of his routine and maybe lead to new info. Just thinking out loud in hopes it helps in some way.
Hey everyone, I’ve been following the case of Miguel Perez, and something has been on my mind. It's strange how there’s been almost no media coverage on his disappearance since it happened. It’s been three years now, and there’s barely been any updates.
Considering the lack of leads and the fact that Miguel was last seen in a relatively populated area like Paterson, you’d think there’d be more to go on or at least more attention given to find him. Does anyone know if there are any efforts being made to bring more awareness, like social media campaigns or events?
It just feels like Miguel’s case has gone too quiet, and it makes me wonder if more public pressure might help spur additional investigations or witness tips. Any thoughts on how we can help to get more eyes on his case?
Does anyone else find it strange that there hasn't been any CCTV footage released from the time Miguel Perez went missing? Given that he was last seen in Paterson, a place that's not shy of surveillance cameras, it seems odd. I always thought that area had quite a few cameras that could have captured something—anything—that might have helped piece this puzzle together. I understand that law enforcement might have their reasons for keeping certain details under wraps, but it feels like this case hasn't gotten the same exposure as others. Are they even looking into this angle, or am I missing something? Any thoughts on why we haven’t heard more about potential video evidence?