- Home
- Cases
- Get Involved
- Community
- Tools
- Info
-
Account
- NOT A MEMBER
Become a Member! - LOGIN
- NOT A MEMBER
- Search Cases
I am Sheryls oldest daughter. And while it may have brought comfort to some that the cops ‘Assumed’ Davis killed my mom there was never any actual physical evidence to confirming that. They only were able to convict him for 1 murder. They assumed it was David because Sheryl actually knew him
I’m so sorry you’ve had to carry all of this, especially the way “assumptions” can get repeated until they start sounding like facts.
For anyone reading, it’s important to separate what’s been proven from what’s suspected. In Sheryl Murwin’s case, a lot of public write-ups lean heavily on Arlie Ray Davis because of patterns in the area and similarities with other cases, but that isn’t the same thing as proof. If there wasn’t physical evidence tying him to your mom, then it’s not accurate for people to say it’s confirmed or solved, and it isn’t fair to your family for rumors to harden into “facts.”
It’s possible Davis was a strong suspect and it’s possible your mom knowing him is part of why investigators considered him, but a suspect isn’t the same as a conviction, and a theory isn’t the same as evidence.
If anyone genuinely has firsthand, verifiable information, the most helpful thing to do is pass it to the investigating agency rather than debating it in public. Even older details can matter in cold cases, and sometimes a small piece of information is what helps connect the dots.
To Sheryl’s daughter, thank you for speaking up and correcting the record. If there are specific claims you keep seeing that you want shut down in this thread, you can say what’s actually confirmed and what isn’t, and I’ll respect that.