295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Sabrina Hatheway: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
Does anyone else find the timing of the arson fire really suspicious? It's like, Sabrina goes missing and less than two weeks later, the house Crozier was living in burns down. The details around this just don't sit right with me. I know the arson charges were about insurance money, but the house wasn't even insured. So strange. Plus, with Crozier and his buddies involved, it makes you wonder if there’s more to this story. Maybe there's something at the house they needed to destroy or someone they needed to silence? I get that he denies involvement in Sabrina's disappearance, but it's hard to ignore the circumstances. Anyone have thoughts on why they would set fire to that place, if not for insurance? It just feels like there might be more here than what's been uncovered.
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
I’ve been following Sabrina Hatheway's case closely, and one detail that really puzzles me is the timing of the arson at Crozier’s house. Isn’t it odd that the place burns down less than two weeks after she vanished? It looks like a desperate move to erase something or divert attention. Considering the fire ended up being an unsuccessful insurance fraud since the house wasn’t even insured, it all seems incredibly reckless or maybe even panicked. Does anyone else think there might be more to explore with these arson connections and perhaps any individuals who might have had motives aligned with Crozier’s? Would love to hear your thoughts or theories on the fire's timing—seems like a major piece of the puzzle that doesn’t quite fit.
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
I’ve been following Sabrina Hatheway’s case, and something always bugged me about the fire at Crozier’s place. The timing is just too coincidental, right? Just days after Sabrina goes missing, the house burns down, and then it turns out it wasn't even insured. I've read somewhere that arsonists might set fires to destroy evidence. Given the situation with Sabrina and considering the charges against Crozier and his buddies, does anyone else think the fire's main aim might have been to cover something up rather than just a botched insurance scam? I know the cops investigated the fire, but I wonder if they thoroughly searched for any link to Sabrina before things went up in flames. Thoughts?