295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.
Forum Posts for Dag Tuterarii Drollet: Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.
I've been following the Dag Drollet case, and one aspect that really sticks out to me is the involvement of Michael Baden for the second autopsy. It makes me wonder why Marlon Brando felt the need to question the initial findings. Considering Baden's reputation and previous high-profile cases he’s been involved with, having him perform the second autopsy must have meant that there were significant concerns or discrepancies that the family wanted addressed. This adds another layer to an already complex and deeply saddening situation. I can only imagine how difficult it must have been for both families involved, trying to piece together the truth while dealing with overwhelming grief and public scrutiny. Whatever the outcome, it's important we remember that a young life was lost and family dynamics were irreparably changed. Does anyone else have thoughts on the impact of the second autopsy in these kinds of cases?
Send Private Message
Characters: 0/5000
Has anyone else been looking into the second autopsy conducted by Michael Baden? I find it interesting that Marlon Brando requested another pathologist after the initial autopsy was done. It makes me wonder what specific concerns Marlon had about the first report. Was he questioning the position from which Dag was shot, or was there something about the state of his injuries that didn't add up for him? It seems unusual for a family to go this route unless they were truly unsure about what happened. I can't help but think about how tragic it must be for the Drollet family to see yet another examination of their loved one, while trying to piece together their own understanding of the events. Anyone have insights or similar thoughts?
