Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
295 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Forum Posts for Jeffrey Hathaway:
Be respectful. Abuse of these forums will not be tolerated.

I've been following the investigation into the Destination for a while, and something that always sticks with me is the role of freezing spray in this tragedy. I’ve read that the Bering Sea is notorious for making conditions worse with these freezing waters. Yet, it seems the crew didn’t take the time to adjust for the impact it could have on their vessel's stability. From what I understand, adjustments and safety measures could have possibly prevented this. It’s just devastating thinking about how the harsh environmental factors played into this situation.
Also, the part about NOAA locating the wreckage at such a depth is quite haunting to me. Imagine the kind of technology that was necessary to pinpoint this underwater. It's admirable what these organizations can do, but it also paints a stark picture of what the crew faced in those moments. These men were experienced and knew the risks, but situations like this remind us all how quickly things can go wrong at sea. Has anyone come across more information regarding what kind of stability improvements were suggested after this incident? Curious to know if any policy changes have stemmed from it.
Has anyone else been astounded by the sheer weight of the bait they took on? 10,000 pounds seems like a massive load, especially with the known stability issues of the Destination. I can't help but think that taking on that extra bait might have been a gamble that unfortunately didn’t pay off. I wonder if other crews in similar situations ever reconsider their bait load, especially in those unpredictable waters. It's just chilling to think how small decisions can lead to such tragic consequences when combined with the harsh Alaskan climate. Would love to hear thoughts on how common it is for fishing vessels to take such risks, and how often they come out fine or end up in close calls.
I was looking into the details of the Destination tragedy, and I'm curious about the decision-making process regarding the extra bait they picked up. Does anyone know if taking on an extra 10,000 pounds of bait is standard for a crab fishing vessel of that size, especially in such freezing conditions? It sounds like the additional weight could have impacted the stability significantly, but I wonder if this is something that other skippers find normal or if it raised concerns even before setting out. Given the Coast Guard's findings about stability problems, I'm trying to understand whether this was a common practice or if it was an unusual choice that contributed to the disaster. Would love to hear insights from anyone familiar with crab fishing operations.
I’ve been following the case of the FV Destination and wanted to talk about one lesser-discussed angle—their route. I can't stop wondering whether the choice to pick up extra bait in Dutch Harbor before heading towards that notorious stretch of the Bering Sea might have influenced what happened. I've read that even small changes in weight distribution onboard can significantly impact stability, especially in freezing conditions like those. Now, I’m not an expert on maritime practices, but considering the notoriously harsh weather during February in that area, it seems odd that they didn’t reconsider their path or load. Could their predetermined schedule have pressured them to take risks? Or might there have been other factors—like previous successful trips—that fueled a sense of security despite the dangers? Anyone else have insights or info on how captains typically handle these kinds of decisions?