Crime Solvers Central
Crime Solvers Central
302 Cases Solved. Advancing justice for missing persons, unsolved homicides, unidentified and unclaimed remains.

Case Description

Any updates on this case? Let us know!
Summary based on the NamUs case record (MP151562)
Luis Alberto Arreola was 22 years old when he disappeared from Fallbrook, a community in northern San Diego County, California. A Hispanic man with black hair and brown eyes, he was described as being about 5 feet 6 inches tall and weighing around 125 pounds. He was also known by the nickname Luis Arriola Pablo. At the time, he was living in an apartment in Fallbrook and was connected to family who cared deeply about him, including a daughter whose DNA has later been provided to assist in efforts to identify him if remains are ever found.

On January 16, 1993, Luis was last seen as a passenger in a vehicle leaving his apartment. The car was headed toward Oceanside, a coastal city to the west, suggesting that he and the driver were undertaking what should have been an ordinary, short trip between neighboring North County communities. Sometime after they left, the vehicle encountered dangerous conditions near North River Road, an area known to be close to waterways that can swell with runoff and become hazardous when water levels rise.

Tragically, the vehicle Luis was riding in was later found in high water near North River Road. Authorities recovered the car and discovered that the driver had died, having been pulled from the flooded vehicle. Luis, however, was not inside when the car was recovered. Based on the conditions and the state of the vehicle, investigators believe that he was likely swept away by the strong current. The combination of deep water, swift flow, and debris often present in such flooding can make escape or rescue extremely difficult, and it can also complicate search and recovery efforts in the hours and days that follow.

The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department opened a missing person investigation shortly after the incident, formally reporting the case on January 20, 1993. Detectives and search teams faced the challenges typical of water-related disappearances: murky conditions, changing currents, and the possibility that a body could be carried far from the original location. Despite these difficulties, Luis’s case has remained open, and the Sheriff’s Department continues to be listed as the investigating agency. The case has been assigned an official law enforcement case number, and a detective contact is identified so that any new leads or information can be reported and evaluated.

Over the years, technological advances have offered additional tools to help families and investigators in long-term missing person cases. In Luis’s case, DNA from his daughter has been collected, providing a crucial reference sample that could allow forensic laboratories to confirm his identity if unidentified remains are ever located and tested. This kind of DNA reference is often one of the most powerful tools available when time, water, and environmental conditions have erased other traces of a person’s disappearance. National missing person databases, which work with law enforcement agencies, medical examiners, and families, help store and compare these records and support the effort to resolve cases that have remained unsolved for many years.

Today, Luis Alberto Arreola is still considered missing, and his family and loved ones continue to live with the uncertainty that began on that day in January 1993. What is known paints a picture of a young man whose life was interrupted in an instant by dangerous floodwaters and whose absence has left a lasting hole in the lives of those who cared for him. Anyone who may know more about what happened to Luis, or who may recall details about the incident on North River Road around that time, is encouraged to contact the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department so that, even after many years, the people who love him might one day receive answers and the possibility of closure.

Last Seen: Jan 16, 1993

Links to Additional Sources (0)

See any mistakes? Let us know!

Possible Unidentified Matches (10)

Unidentified remains cases whose details are consistent with this person, ranked by how closely they compare. Fields that are unknown in either case are left out of the score.

85%Strong
John Doe — Pine Valley, California
UP58362 • Found Mar 28, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same county
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'6"
Weight 99%138 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
84%Moderate
John Doe — Cardiff, California - unidentified case UP115406
John Doe — Cardiff, California
UP115406 • Found Jul 14, 1996
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 25–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 96%25 mi away, same county
TimingFound 3 years after last seen
Height 84%5'4" vs 5'6"
Weight 100%130 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — Jamul, California
UP56776 • Found Apr 25, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 89%50 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'6"
Weight 82%149 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — Pine Valley, California
UP56812 • Found Dec 4, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same county
TimingFound 5 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'6"
Weight 86%146 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — San Diego, California
UP116225 • Found Apr 4, 1995
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%58 mi away, same county
TimingFound 2 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'6"
Weight 91%143 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 60%Brown vs Black
Eyes 90%Black vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — Imperial Beach, California
UP58991 • Found Mar 3, 1993
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–32 vs 22
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 88%55 mi away, same county
TimingFound 7 weeks after last seen
Height 68%5'3" vs 5'6"
Weight 100%123 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — Bell Gardens, California
UP3399 • Found Nov 25, 1998
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–30 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 85%66 mi away, same state
TimingFound 6 years after last seen
Height 100%5'5" vs 5'6"
Weight 100%130 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
83%Moderate
John Doe — East Rancho Dominguez, California - unidentified case UP3480
John Doe — East Rancho Dominguez, California
UP3480 • Found Jan 19, 1997
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 18–27 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 85%65 mi away, same state
TimingFound 4 years after last seen
Height 100%5'7" vs 5'6"
Weight 99%138 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
82%Moderate
John Doe — Lake Elsinore, California - unidentified case UP112534
John Doe — Lake Elsinore, California
UP112534 • Found Sep 9, 2006
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 20–35 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 97%21 mi away, same state
TimingFound 14 years after last seen
Height 84%5'4" vs 5'6"
Weight 100%127 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown
82%Moderate
John Doe — Pine Valley, California
UP55716 • Found Jan 24, 2004
View case
Sex ✓Male
Age 100%Est. 28–42 vs 22 when missing
Race 100%Hispanic
Location 87%57 mi away, same county
TimingFound 11 years after last seen
Height 100%5'6" vs 5'6"
Weight 100%123 lb vs 125 lb
Hair 100%Black vs Black
Eyes 100%Brown vs Brown

These comparisons are generated automatically from public NamUs case data and are not confirmed identifications. Only DNA, dental or fingerprint comparison by investigators can confirm an identity. If you believe two cases are connected, contact the agency handling the unidentified case.

Unidentified photos are blurred because many are post-mortem. Tap a photo to reveal it.